If you silience them they can be seen as vicitims, if you let them speak they will be exposed as hate filled fools.
Excuse myignorance of TV in the you UK but since the BBC doesn't sell advertising why would they care about ratings?
Excuse myignorance of TV in the you UK but since the BBC doesn't sell advertising why would they care about ratings?
I'm worried about the increase in racial attacks that could be a result of increasing BNP exposure.
As for the BBC, they've moved Strictly Come Dancing (One of their flagship shows) back to an earlier time to stop it clashing with ITV's Xfactor, which has been beating them in the ratings.
The BBC makes lots of programs that dont get big audiences it's granted, however they do like the occasional big show of things to grab the audience share. Frequently they've shown new programs on BBC 3/ to see if their is an audience then moved them to BBC 1 or 2.
Logically they shouldn't care, but I suppose they see it as a way of validating their funding.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Question Time and the BNP
22/10/2009 07:29:34 PM
- 907 Views
I think you gain more letting them speak them trying to silience them
22/10/2009 07:58:52 PM
- 588 Views
They like ratings.
22/10/2009 08:22:59 PM
- 609 Views
It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
- 215 Views
I think it's a good call from the BBC, and I do intend to watch it.
22/10/2009 08:41:25 PM
- 483 Views
Sorry, we're 20 years behind the rest of Europe because we have a system that makes it hard...
22/10/2009 10:33:08 PM
- 505 Views
I rather liked (if I can be forgiven for sounding like a broken record) ...
22/10/2009 10:57:10 PM
- 725 Views
BNP membership list
22/10/2009 11:01:34 PM
- 648 Views
I find the leaking of that to be disturbing.
23/10/2009 01:38:09 PM
- 571 Views
That was really quite disappointing.
22/10/2009 11:42:58 PM
- 542 Views
I thought it was perfectly executed.
22/10/2009 11:58:18 PM
- 517 Views
That's why I said it'd have been much more interesting without him.
23/10/2009 12:33:57 AM
- 629 Views
I think it exposed him as an non-viable alternative
23/10/2009 12:54:57 AM
- 652 Views
You clearly watched a different programme to me. *NM*
23/10/2009 12:57:59 AM
- 269 Views
At which point did it show he was anywhere near capable of being a serious politician
23/10/2009 01:15:20 AM
- 494 Views
At which point do you think any rational human being thought he was a serious politician?
23/10/2009 01:21:38 AM
- 663 Views
I think the Radio 1 interview a few weeks back did a better job of exposing their lunacy.
23/10/2009 01:06:19 AM
- 622 Views
Went about how I expected
23/10/2009 12:16:50 PM
- 612 Views
Pretty much my thoughts exactly
23/10/2009 01:22:56 PM
- 582 Views
Re: Pretty much my thoughts exactly
23/10/2009 02:14:50 PM
- 637 Views
I think we liked and disliked the same thing for the same reasons
23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
- 601 Views

I've already seen BBC interviews today out on the street
23/10/2009 02:14:13 PM
- 572 Views
It will be interesting to see any polls done, to see the actual impact.
23/10/2009 02:55:49 PM
- 583 Views