At which point do you think any rational human being thought he was a serious politician?
Wibble Send a noteboard - 23/10/2009 01:21:38 AM
For the leader of a political party to be dismantled that badly was hillarious.
He's the leader of a far right racist party, by and large supported by racists. The BNP didn' get seats in Europe because they are a 'viable alternative', they got those seats in a protest vote. People voting against immigration in protest at the lack of a serious debate on the issue, and people not voting in disgust at the lack of any actual truth or decency from mainstream parties.
Did that program address any of that? No, it confirmed everything that was true before to be true today.
The BNP are still racist. The other parties are still gutless on actual debate about immigration, preferring to sling racist around. And the best way to wind people up, show dissatisfaction with the political process, and slap the mainstream in the face...is to protest vote...probably BNP.
I don't think they'll get a seat at the genral election at all, or any big vote. People tend not to protest vote when it matters. But come by-elections, council elections and EU elections, if they state of politics is what it is now. Expect a repeat of the EU electiosn a few months ago.
Question Time and the BNP
- 22/10/2009 07:29:34 PM
1073 Views
I think you gain more letting them speak them trying to silience them
- 22/10/2009 07:58:52 PM
742 Views
They like ratings.
- 22/10/2009 08:22:59 PM
767 Views
*NM*
*NM*
It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
- 22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
290 Views
I think it's a good call from the BBC, and I do intend to watch it.
- 22/10/2009 08:41:25 PM
648 Views
Sorry, we're 20 years behind the rest of Europe because we have a system that makes it hard...
- 22/10/2009 10:33:08 PM
665 Views
I rather liked (if I can be forgiven for sounding like a broken record) ...
- 22/10/2009 10:57:10 PM
913 Views
BNP membership list
- 22/10/2009 11:01:34 PM
826 Views
I find the leaking of that to be disturbing.
- 23/10/2009 01:38:09 PM
724 Views
That was really quite disappointing.
- 22/10/2009 11:42:58 PM
713 Views
I thought it was perfectly executed.
- 22/10/2009 11:58:18 PM
683 Views
That's why I said it'd have been much more interesting without him.
- 23/10/2009 12:33:57 AM
793 Views
I think it exposed him as an non-viable alternative
- 23/10/2009 12:54:57 AM
821 Views
You clearly watched a different programme to me. *NM*
- 23/10/2009 12:57:59 AM
342 Views
At which point did it show he was anywhere near capable of being a serious politician
- 23/10/2009 01:15:20 AM
656 Views
At which point do you think any rational human being thought he was a serious politician?
- 23/10/2009 01:21:38 AM
841 Views
I think the Radio 1 interview a few weeks back did a better job of exposing their lunacy.
- 23/10/2009 01:06:19 AM
789 Views
Went about how I expected
- 23/10/2009 12:16:50 PM
763 Views
Pretty much my thoughts exactly
- 23/10/2009 01:22:56 PM
747 Views
Re: Pretty much my thoughts exactly
- 23/10/2009 02:14:50 PM
805 Views
I think we liked and disliked the same thing for the same reasons 
- 23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
772 Views
- 23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
772 Views
I've already seen BBC interviews today out on the street
- 23/10/2009 02:14:13 PM
741 Views
It will be interesting to see any polls done, to see the actual impact.
- 23/10/2009 02:55:49 PM
749 Views