Or, if they don't care that much about the non-insured, then what are they at least offering to lessen the enormous costs in percentage of GDP that the US spends on health care?
seems to be about it, to cut insurance costs.
Disclaimer: Anyone with proper facts are welcome to correct me, this is mostly an impression that I've picked up from watching the health care debate.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat? 
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
679 Views
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
679 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
- 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
263 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
- 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
264 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
- 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
270 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
- 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
266 Views
It makes people question their priorities
- 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
338 Views
Maybe they should.
- 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
297 Views
You act like America is a collective
- 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
354 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
- 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
258 Views
Tort reform
- 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
251 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
120 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
- 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
253 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
- 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
255 Views
that simply proves they are inept
- 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
256 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
- 19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
274 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
- 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
315 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
- 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
338 Views
Curious about the last part.
- 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
345 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
- 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
252 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
- 20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
318 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
- 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
392 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
- 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
248 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
- 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
243 Views
I know who I'm voting for! 
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
290 Views
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
290 Views
I'm starting to think.....
- 18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM
280 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM
127 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
- 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
353 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
- 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
332 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
- 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
359 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
- 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
333 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
- 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
283 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
- 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
276 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
- 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
269 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
- 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
368 Views