Or, if they don't care that much about the non-insured, then what are they at least offering to lessen the enormous costs in percentage of GDP that the US spends on health care?
seems to be about it, to cut insurance costs.
Disclaimer: Anyone with proper facts are welcome to correct me, this is mostly an impression that I've picked up from watching the health care debate.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat? 
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
655 Views
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
655 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
- 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
244 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
- 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
244 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
- 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
253 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
- 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
252 Views
It makes people question their priorities
- 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
318 Views
Maybe they should.
- 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
273 Views
You act like America is a collective
- 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
331 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
- 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
239 Views
Tort reform
- 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
231 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
111 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
- 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
232 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
- 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
232 Views
that simply proves they are inept
- 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
229 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
- 19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
253 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
- 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
289 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
- 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
314 Views
Curious about the last part.
- 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
321 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
- 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
232 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
- 20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
293 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
- 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
369 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
- 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
225 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
- 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
216 Views
I know who I'm voting for! 
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
273 Views
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
273 Views
I'm starting to think.....
- 18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM
262 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM
116 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
- 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
331 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
- 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
313 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
- 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
336 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
- 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
313 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
- 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
262 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
- 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
249 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
- 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
245 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
- 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
350 Views