Active Users:350 Time:03/07/2025 08:20:56 PM
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. ) Joel Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
He seems to think Coakley will probably win but it's so close he doesn't want to say it given how good his record is when he does make predictions.

Realized a bit late there was more than one way that could be read. I also didn't know until today this was a special election because MA Dems have changed their Senate vacancy laws twice in six years to prevent the very thing those changes now threaten: A Republican Senator from MA. If they're going to change the law back and forth when they please just to lock the Republicans out of the race I'm not sure they deserve to retain the seat. And all sucking up to Lieberman for six months did was delay the Senate bill long enough to put things right back where they were: One vote short of 60. Only difference is that, except for exchanges, everything that made the bill appealing to ANYONE but an insurance company got stripped in the process. I might understand increasing taxes and debt to a bankrupt industry, but private insurance doesn't exactly fit that definition.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 19/01/2010 at 11:45:12 PM
Reply to message
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat? - 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM 626 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over - 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM 215 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election..... - 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM 217 Views
it works both ways you know - 18/01/2010 04:37:40 PM 220 Views
I disagree... - 20/01/2010 04:11:15 AM 242 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats - 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM 223 Views
You may be right on that last bit, unfortunately... *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:18:37 PM 100 Views
Agreed - blunder of epic proportions! *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:18 PM 101 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy. - 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM 220 Views
It makes people question their priorities - 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM 287 Views
Maybe they should. - 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM 242 Views
You act like America is a collective - 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM 299 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured? - 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM 205 Views
Tort reform - 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM 198 Views
purchase insurance across state lines - 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM 199 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either - 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM 202 Views
Exactly. - 19/01/2010 02:09:49 AM 310 Views
that simply proves they are inept - 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM 201 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress. - 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM 256 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine - 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM 282 Views
Curious about the last part. - 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM 291 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument - 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM 203 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse. - 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM 337 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective - 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM 192 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace. - 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM 186 Views
Human nature can not be overcome it can only be redirected - 20/01/2010 07:03:46 PM 199 Views
That's a bigger debate than politics. - 20/01/2010 10:42:02 PM 319 Views
I know who I'm voting for! - 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM 244 Views
I'm starting to think..... - 18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM 229 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM 106 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid... - 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM 292 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense - 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM 282 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true. - 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM 308 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution - 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM 283 Views
Fair enough. - 18/01/2010 10:00:16 PM 210 Views
Any argument made by Dowd is suspect from the start - 18/01/2010 10:39:28 PM 255 Views
They should keep making them actually filibuster, yes. - 18/01/2010 10:09:01 PM 374 Views
Fight the good fight, my man...er...dog! - 18/01/2010 05:48:08 PM 214 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked. - 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM 235 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly..... - 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM 217 Views
Of course, they weren't in a crisis this bad. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:22:46 PM 101 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it... - 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM 213 Views
Thanks. I was racking my brains for the name of that site. *NM* - 19/01/2010 01:03:29 AM 95 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. ) - 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM 323 Views

Reply to Message