Active Users:290 Time:17/05/2024 03:59:05 PM
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US. Liam Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM
Just a little something that I have been wondering about for years. In Europe (and as far as I can tell also in Japan with the Liberal Democratic Party and probably other Asian countries as well), the term "liberal" (as a political term) denotes a party or politician that specifically starts with the freedom of individuals making their own choices. It started with the ideas of John Locke in the 17th century and the name "liberal" is derived from the Latin Liberalis or "free" (as far as I can tell, my Latin is a bit rusty - please feel free to improve my language skills).
It usually denotes political views propagating free trade, individual freedom and taking away barriers for individuals to grow (smaller government bodies, lower taxes, etc), but also a strict separation of church and state.
Liberal is usually considered (central-)right.

In The US however, "liberal" is more or less equated with left-wing politics. I have seen it equated with big government, big spending and anti-freedom.

How did that distinction start? Where does it originate?


I think before that it was probably more the liberalism you describe, and involved drawing power away from the Crown and so on. I'm kind of guessing though.

No clue about American liberals.

OH, also, whilst I'd say that liberal (prior to the Lib Dems) probably refers to big government over here, I certainly wouldn't link it to anti-freedom. But that's just different mindsets I suppose.
---

Oh, how simply grand it is to be travelling by dirigible again. Direct us to the west good sir, tonight we will remember what it is to live.
Reply to message
Why does the American interpretation of "liberal" differ from the European? - 09/02/2010 09:15:39 AM 674 Views
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US. - 09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM 588 Views
Especially from the more outspoken Republicans... - 09/02/2010 09:45:35 AM 394 Views
Because the US started off with the idea of freedom of individuals... - 09/02/2010 09:40:59 AM 446 Views
Using that word "marxist" really undermines the credibility of your post. *NM* - 09/02/2010 10:25:42 AM 151 Views
Only to people who don't understand Marxism in the slightest! *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:32:39 PM 145 Views
Eh, obviously you can point to elements of Marxist influence in the Democratic Party... - 09/02/2010 02:52:34 PM 404 Views
True... - 09/02/2010 08:50:21 PM 389 Views
The Democratic Party. People in the party are Democrats. - 09/02/2010 09:22:00 PM 382 Views
To some extent I agree with you. - 09/02/2010 12:36:28 PM 396 Views
If the term Big Business - 09/02/2010 02:38:33 PM 388 Views
John Locke! OMFG Lost! - 09/02/2010 10:06:16 AM 414 Views
I think it's because in America it means "socially liberal" - 09/02/2010 01:44:48 PM 423 Views
I'm with Tom, here. *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:34:46 PM 195 Views
Because they got offended when they were called socialist and progressive didn't stick *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:09:10 PM 157 Views
Hah. Progressive wasn't dirty-sounding enough for the other side to go along with it *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:35:35 PM 183 Views
no were just not willing to let them soil another word - 09/02/2010 08:18:58 PM 361 Views
And to think, the antonym to Pro is Con... - 09/02/2010 08:52:30 PM 410 Views
1988. george bush vs. michael dukakis - 10/02/2010 03:37:13 AM 396 Views
Sorta like "racist" is used by the left. *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:31:50 PM 159 Views
no. not even close. - 14/02/2010 08:19:33 PM 351 Views

Reply to Message