Active Users:190 Time:20/05/2024 10:57:17 PM
I'm with Tom, here. *NM* lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 07:34:46 PM
American liberals probably received that appellation some time around the First World War (or right before it). The era of Eugene V. Debs, John Reed, Max Eastman and pretty much everyone in the Greenwich Village socialist scene helped to turn people whose thinking was "liberal" or "free" to social causes - unions, anti-war rallies, pushes for full suffrage (women and minorities), temperance, full employment and, in many cases, the implementation of a socialist state. After the Russian Revolution and the Red Scare, someone who advocated full-blown socialism tended to be classified as a "radical", so "liberal" was somewhere closer to the center but still definitely on the left.
Reply to message
Why does the American interpretation of "liberal" differ from the European? - 09/02/2010 09:15:39 AM 674 Views
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US. - 09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM 588 Views
Especially from the more outspoken Republicans... - 09/02/2010 09:45:35 AM 394 Views
Because the US started off with the idea of freedom of individuals... - 09/02/2010 09:40:59 AM 448 Views
Using that word "marxist" really undermines the credibility of your post. *NM* - 09/02/2010 10:25:42 AM 152 Views
Only to people who don't understand Marxism in the slightest! *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:32:39 PM 145 Views
Eh, obviously you can point to elements of Marxist influence in the Democratic Party... - 09/02/2010 02:52:34 PM 405 Views
True... - 09/02/2010 08:50:21 PM 390 Views
The Democratic Party. People in the party are Democrats. - 09/02/2010 09:22:00 PM 383 Views
To some extent I agree with you. - 09/02/2010 12:36:28 PM 396 Views
If the term Big Business - 09/02/2010 02:38:33 PM 389 Views
John Locke! OMFG Lost! - 09/02/2010 10:06:16 AM 416 Views
I think it's because in America it means "socially liberal" - 09/02/2010 01:44:48 PM 423 Views
I'm with Tom, here. *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:34:46 PM 197 Views
Because they got offended when they were called socialist and progressive didn't stick *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:09:10 PM 157 Views
Hah. Progressive wasn't dirty-sounding enough for the other side to go along with it *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:35:35 PM 183 Views
no were just not willing to let them soil another word - 09/02/2010 08:18:58 PM 361 Views
And to think, the antonym to Pro is Con... - 09/02/2010 08:52:30 PM 410 Views
1988. george bush vs. michael dukakis - 10/02/2010 03:37:13 AM 396 Views
Sorta like "racist" is used by the left. *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:31:50 PM 159 Views
no. not even close. - 14/02/2010 08:19:33 PM 351 Views

Reply to Message