Active Users:242 Time:21/05/2024 03:36:06 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Especially from the more outspoken Republicans... Artsapat Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 09:45:35 AM
I have heard people call liberals "anti-freedom". But, as you said: probably a different mind set. (And debating tactics).

What I'm interesting in, is where did this change?

I didn't know that about the UK. I already figured it would be more like mainland Europe. But then: I only know about liberalism in the UK from the LibDems, which seems to be like D66 in the Netherlands.
In addition, there is the whole "liberal block" in the European Parliament (of which LibDems are a part), which is definitely more right wing then leftish...
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Why does the American interpretation of "liberal" differ from the European? Artsapat - 09/02/2010 09:15:39 AM 674 Views
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US. Liam - 09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM 588 Views
Especially from the more outspoken Republicans... Artsapat - 09/02/2010 09:45:35 AM 395 Views
Because the US started off with the idea of freedom of individuals... MightyYT - 09/02/2010 09:40:59 AM 448 Views
Using that word "marxist" really undermines the credibility of your post. *NM* Legolas - 09/02/2010 10:25:42 AM 152 Views
Only to people who don't understand Marxism in the slightest! *NM* MightyYT - 09/02/2010 02:32:39 PM 145 Views
Eh, obviously you can point to elements of Marxist influence in the Democratic Party... Legolas - 09/02/2010 02:52:34 PM 405 Views
True... MightyYT - 09/02/2010 08:50:21 PM 390 Views
The Democratic Party. People in the party are Democrats. Ghavrel - 09/02/2010 09:22:00 PM 383 Views
Anytime the people who object to an ideology are permitted to define it... Dannymac - 09/02/2010 10:56:46 PM 355 Views
To some extent I agree with you. PhotoJim - 09/02/2010 12:36:28 PM 396 Views
If the term Big Business MightyYT - 09/02/2010 02:38:33 PM 389 Views
John Locke! OMFG Lost! ironclad - 09/02/2010 10:06:16 AM 416 Views
I think it's because in America it means "socially liberal" Tom - 09/02/2010 01:44:48 PM 423 Views
I'm with Tom, here. *NM* lord-of-shadow - 09/02/2010 07:34:46 PM 197 Views
Because they got offended when they were called socialist and progressive didn't stick *NM* random thoughts - 09/02/2010 02:09:10 PM 157 Views
Hah. Progressive wasn't dirty-sounding enough for the other side to go along with it *NM* lord-of-shadow - 09/02/2010 07:35:35 PM 183 Views
no were just not willing to let them soil another word random thoughts - 09/02/2010 08:18:58 PM 362 Views
And to think, the antonym to Pro is Con... MightyYT - 09/02/2010 08:52:30 PM 410 Views
1988. george bush vs. michael dukakis moondog - 10/02/2010 03:37:13 AM 396 Views
Sorta like "racist" is used by the left. *NM* beckstcw - 14/02/2010 06:31:50 PM 159 Views
no. not even close. moondog - 14/02/2010 08:19:33 PM 351 Views
In America we typically now refer to true liberals (i.e. Locke) as "classical liberal(ism)" Cannoli - 12/02/2010 05:06:38 AM 472 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes