Active Users:264 Time:21/05/2024 07:09:51 AM
In America we typically now refer to true liberals (i.e. Locke) as "classical liberal(ism)" Cannoli Send a noteboard - 12/02/2010 05:06:38 AM
In The US however, "liberal" is more or less equated with left-wing politics. I have seen it equated with big government, big spending and anti-freedom.

How did that distinction start? Where does it originate?


As noted above, it is generally used to tag a whole range of political positions associated with the same mindset that is "socially liberal." They hijacked the word which was originally meant in a context of freedom from government and liberty, using "liberal" in the sense of "permissive" and even prodigal.

In America, where freedom has strong connotations and associations with the foundation and ideals of the country (i.e. Sons of Liberty, Liberty Bell), the word liberal was more attractive and appealing than the usual labels associated with the left-wing political platforms. Tending more towards volunteer or private enterprises to do things performed by governments in Europe, names like "Socialism" were alien to Americans, and mistrusted. It was by shifting the common useage of liberal to mean socially permissive, and redefining "freedoms" and "rights" to include active benefices, rather than freedom from restrictions, that left-wing agendas were enacted. Classical liberalism and Christianity were used to justify left-wing and so-called "progressive" movements and efforts.

This sort of trojan-horse leftist strategy is typical of how most of the modern liberal agenda got enacted. For instance, conservationism started out with the stereotypically conservative types, who wanted to keep their lands looking nice, without poor people cluttering up the landscapes with their hovels and waste.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Why does the American interpretation of "liberal" differ from the European? - 09/02/2010 09:15:39 AM 675 Views
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US. - 09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM 588 Views
Especially from the more outspoken Republicans... - 09/02/2010 09:45:35 AM 395 Views
Because the US started off with the idea of freedom of individuals... - 09/02/2010 09:40:59 AM 448 Views
Using that word "marxist" really undermines the credibility of your post. *NM* - 09/02/2010 10:25:42 AM 152 Views
Only to people who don't understand Marxism in the slightest! *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:32:39 PM 145 Views
Eh, obviously you can point to elements of Marxist influence in the Democratic Party... - 09/02/2010 02:52:34 PM 405 Views
True... - 09/02/2010 08:50:21 PM 390 Views
The Democratic Party. People in the party are Democrats. - 09/02/2010 09:22:00 PM 383 Views
To some extent I agree with you. - 09/02/2010 12:36:28 PM 396 Views
If the term Big Business - 09/02/2010 02:38:33 PM 389 Views
John Locke! OMFG Lost! - 09/02/2010 10:06:16 AM 416 Views
I think it's because in America it means "socially liberal" - 09/02/2010 01:44:48 PM 424 Views
I'm with Tom, here. *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:34:46 PM 197 Views
Because they got offended when they were called socialist and progressive didn't stick *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:09:10 PM 158 Views
Hah. Progressive wasn't dirty-sounding enough for the other side to go along with it *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:35:35 PM 183 Views
no were just not willing to let them soil another word - 09/02/2010 08:18:58 PM 362 Views
And to think, the antonym to Pro is Con... - 09/02/2010 08:52:30 PM 411 Views
1988. george bush vs. michael dukakis - 10/02/2010 03:37:13 AM 397 Views
Sorta like "racist" is used by the left. *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:31:50 PM 160 Views
no. not even close. - 14/02/2010 08:19:33 PM 352 Views
In America we typically now refer to true liberals (i.e. Locke) as "classical liberal(ism)" - 12/02/2010 05:06:38 AM 473 Views

Reply to Message