Active Users:792 Time:10/06/2026 08:00:05 AM
It is rather interesting to pick what historical period is most relevant here... jh Send a noteboard - 01/03/2010 07:59:22 PM
Now how do these stats go when sorting the regular way, i.e. by number of golds first, then silvers, then bronze?

And I think one obsolete state that should be included is the Kalmar Union of Sweden (including Finland), Norway and Denmark. After looking it up on wikipedia I see that Iceland should also be included.


After all, later on sweden held the baltic states too (and some small pieces of germany), but lost control over parts of norway... Now, the big question here is where are the norwegian medalists from?
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Medal counts for obsolete states - 01/03/2010 12:19:58 PM 666 Views
Nice job - 01/03/2010 12:41:42 PM 219 Views
Good one *NM* - 01/03/2010 03:33:34 PM 63 Views
It is rather interesting to pick what historical period is most relevant here... - 01/03/2010 07:59:22 PM 177 Views
You beat me to that. *NM* - 02/03/2010 12:21:51 PM 63 Views
awesome. *NM* - 01/03/2010 01:04:15 PM 49 Views
Nothing for the British Empire? *NM* - 01/03/2010 01:23:11 PM 50 Views
Counting the US, Canada, Australia, and the UK together = 67. *NM* - 01/03/2010 01:46:39 PM 57 Views
If they had ever ruled 1/3 of the present country, I might have... - 01/03/2010 03:33:05 PM 203 Views
How did the Mongols fare? *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:00:51 PM 63 Views
I think they get Kahzakstan's one. They didn't get enough of Poland or Russia to claim their medals - 02/03/2010 06:52:53 PM 143 Views
And the Chinese ones... not so bad a haul, then. *NM* - 02/03/2010 07:42:37 PM 61 Views
12, if you cede them all of China *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:35:48 PM 52 Views
Any idea on Korea? I'm thinking not, but who knows... *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:39:28 PM 48 Views
Vassal state for only 80 years. - 03/03/2010 02:18:04 PM 143 Views

Reply to Message