I only used Mexicans because I'm from Arizona
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 03/03/2010 07:04:29 AM

So given that I had many friends who were hispanic and fresh out of legal immigrant families, I went with it
But you could say the same about other countries with similar or worse living conditions, which really was my point there. Mexicans/hispanics are just the group I'm most familiar with.
As I said, the only reason I used mexicans were because that's what I'm familiar with. You could substitute any applicable group, and I wasn't hinking there was some magic quota
And I'm not saying that this family shouldn't come here!! I'm just saying that they shouldn't use Asylum to do so.
I don't think they were persecuted because it wasn't public-school or die!! They could have sent their kids to ANY school for that one year. They could have picked a nice little evangelical school, or a private school that taught a curriculum they agree with. They could have, you know, thought about the fact that home schooling is illegal in Germany before their kids were of schooling age. That's always a good thing too. Think of all that time and money and horrible indoctrination that could have been saved. The fines and police-marching are shitty, but it's not like they couldn't have started the application process before they had kids, or when their kids were nearing of-schooling age. Or did they think they'd be able to slip under the radar? I don't know. Either way, I think you do raise a good point how it could be considered persecution, but it's not like Germany teaches Nazi-ism and Atheism. Unless their kids are in middle school, they wouldn't even be learning controversial things like "evolution" (which I would presume as evangelicals they'd have an objection to). In this instance, I would not call it persecution. If it was a different country, I could possibly agree with you, but in this instance, I think Asylum was totally unnecessary.

Now, what we were arguing was two-fold.
1) Whether the family had a moral "right" to invoke the law. You said no, because there were other people who deserved it more. Namely, Mexicans. I pointed out that this family immigrating through use of Asylum law has no effect whatsoever on Mexican immigrants. It's not like there're ten slots every year, and once they're gone, they're gone. It's a case by case basis. Some people definitely deserve to be here more than these people, and aren't able to make it happen, for various reasons, but that doesn't mean this family shouldn't come too.
As I said, the only reason I used mexicans were because that's what I'm familiar with. You could substitute any applicable group, and I wasn't hinking there was some magic quota

2) The morality of the law itself / the judge's decision. You said that the law shouldn't apply to people like this because they're not persecuted. Going to school for a year is "no big deal." I said that, generically, being fined tens of thousands of dollars and having policemen show up every morning to take your kids to be indoctrinated in a belief system you vehemently disagree with DOES sound like persecution. The only reason you don't think they were persecuted is that you don't agree with their morals.
I don't think they were persecuted because it wasn't public-school or die!! They could have sent their kids to ANY school for that one year. They could have picked a nice little evangelical school, or a private school that taught a curriculum they agree with. They could have, you know, thought about the fact that home schooling is illegal in Germany before their kids were of schooling age. That's always a good thing too. Think of all that time and money and horrible indoctrination that could have been saved. The fines and police-marching are shitty, but it's not like they couldn't have started the application process before they had kids, or when their kids were nearing of-schooling age. Or did they think they'd be able to slip under the radar? I don't know. Either way, I think you do raise a good point how it could be considered persecution, but it's not like Germany teaches Nazi-ism and Atheism. Unless their kids are in middle school, they wouldn't even be learning controversial things like "evolution" (which I would presume as evangelicals they'd have an objection to). In this instance, I would not call it persecution. If it was a different country, I could possibly agree with you, but in this instance, I think Asylum was totally unnecessary.
So. Nice little summary for us there. 

Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Homeschooling: German Family Gets Political Asylum in U.S.
02/03/2010 10:30:01 PM
- 1466 Views
Looks like a win-win situation to me.
02/03/2010 11:01:22 PM
- 746 Views
Germany does have a history of getting rid of people it doesn't like *NM*
03/03/2010 02:08:37 PM
- 463 Views
Yawn. At least beckstcw was joking when he invoked Godwin's law below. I hope. *NM*
03/03/2010 02:10:18 PM
- 381 Views
That is a load of crap
03/03/2010 02:53:02 PM
- 465 Views
uhm, how would Germany be offending the US?
03/03/2010 02:56:52 PM
- 426 Views
Um.
03/03/2010 02:57:53 PM
- 309 Views
But our religious beliefs and belief in allowing religious freedom is fair game?
03/03/2010 03:09:48 PM
- 319 Views
Yes?
03/03/2010 03:40:30 PM
- 297 Views
If you made fun of the Native Americans I would be offended
03/03/2010 03:46:05 PM
- 540 Views
It's actually quite the opposite.
03/03/2010 03:57:19 PM
- 515 Views
and I would say they trying to fix intolerance with more intolerance
03/03/2010 04:13:49 PM
- 300 Views
That was probably the stupidest thing I ever saw you write
03/03/2010 03:28:39 PM
- 470 Views
You were the one who said good riddance
03/03/2010 03:43:24 PM
- 326 Views
It's the usual story of American ideology and European pragmatism.
03/03/2010 03:52:51 PM
- 485 Views
This is getting a bit off the discussion. Please keep it civil, everyone. *NM*
03/03/2010 06:55:11 PM
- 402 Views
Re: Homeschooling: German Family Gets Political Asylum in U.S.
03/03/2010 01:09:23 AM
- 879 Views
The socialization thing is mostly garbage
03/03/2010 02:32:19 AM
- 755 Views
Yep, exactly.
03/03/2010 02:41:14 AM
- 544 Views
Re: Yep, exactly.
03/03/2010 03:12:48 AM
- 526 Views
*shrugs* I said it was anecdotal. I have no hard figures, only experiences.
03/03/2010 03:28:29 AM
- 520 Views
The operative word IS mostly
03/03/2010 04:33:20 AM
- 719 Views
'Mostly' is all that matters
03/03/2010 05:46:01 AM
- 758 Views
Uhm, socialization is incredibly important.
03/03/2010 06:03:30 AM
- 727 Views
Yes, but you don't need to be taught to do it
03/03/2010 06:47:06 AM
- 676 Views
cats aren't pack or herd animals
03/03/2010 06:53:02 AM
- 666 Views

Something of an inside joke, sorry
03/03/2010 07:41:50 AM
- 707 Views
us closely associated with schools are sensitive on the issue too
03/03/2010 01:05:27 PM
- 521 Views

Re: us closely associated with schools are sensitive on the issue too
03/03/2010 10:19:21 PM
- 591 Views

I would agree that households with two working parnets shouldn't home school *NM*
03/03/2010 03:22:51 PM
- 383 Views
to jump on the "I was homeschooled and I have social skills" bandwagon...
03/03/2010 06:27:05 AM
- 1077 Views
I was homeschooled through grade 12, and my mom has done pro bono legal work for HSLDA.
03/03/2010 02:20:38 AM
- 668 Views
I agree that it can be a very good option for some families
03/03/2010 04:42:21 AM
- 804 Views
Re: I agree that it can be a very good option for some families
03/03/2010 05:16:17 AM
- 637 Views
It depends on the public school.
03/03/2010 05:23:09 AM
- 673 Views
Re: It depends on the public school.
03/03/2010 05:45:07 AM
- 677 Views
"done right" is not always the case
03/03/2010 05:58:26 AM
- 504 Views
Re: "done right" is not always the case
03/03/2010 06:14:43 AM
- 823 Views
Re: "done right" is not always the case
03/03/2010 06:31:04 AM
- 735 Views
Well let's talk stats then.
03/03/2010 06:55:14 AM
- 695 Views
please do not get me started on statistis.
03/03/2010 07:11:19 AM
- 616 Views
Your comments on public school educations have rather limited relevance to other countries, though.
03/03/2010 09:53:30 AM
- 747 Views
While I support homeschooling, this is ridiculous.
03/03/2010 04:48:40 AM
- 803 Views
Meh.
03/03/2010 05:20:50 AM
- 727 Views
one year in a public school
03/03/2010 05:32:13 AM
- 775 Views
Re: one year in a public school
03/03/2010 05:58:48 AM
- 549 Views
No, I think i will nitpick.
03/03/2010 06:11:44 AM
- 678 Views
This is getting off track and wasting time.
03/03/2010 06:26:36 AM
- 715 Views
I'm not even certain it's 100% legal.
03/03/2010 06:34:44 AM
- 501 Views
Yes, but we can't argue abuse of law.
03/03/2010 06:51:23 AM
- 611 Views
I only used Mexicans because I'm from Arizona
03/03/2010 07:04:29 AM
- 740 Views

I think I have the gist of it,
03/03/2010 07:17:40 AM
- 631 Views
we haven't heard anything about their beliefs for me to think they're stupid.
03/03/2010 02:54:25 PM
- 719 Views
According to the Süddeutsche Zeitung...
03/03/2010 03:38:13 PM
- 641 Views
Say what?
03/03/2010 09:38:40 AM
- 589 Views
Being able raise your kids by your beliefs is a frivolous matter?
03/03/2010 03:21:23 PM
- 524 Views
Germany is not saying "you can't raise your kids by your beliefs"
03/03/2010 03:31:01 PM
- 647 Views
It's not a recent law, and supposedly other German families have moved to France and the UK.
03/03/2010 03:45:56 PM
- 740 Views
I think that would fly in very face of political assylum
03/03/2010 04:12:48 PM
- 690 Views
Yes, but they did not need political asylum.
03/03/2010 04:28:16 PM
- 704 Views
how is that different then other political refuges we allow in?
03/03/2010 04:55:14 PM
- 618 Views
I believe Legolas linked an article
03/03/2010 04:57:09 PM
- 594 Views
I never saw the link
03/03/2010 05:08:21 PM
- 511 Views
I'm not sure if they offered "formal" assurances or some such
03/03/2010 05:21:54 PM
- 431 Views
that was a mayor, I doubt he would have the final word on the issue
03/03/2010 05:46:22 PM
- 488 Views
You don't have a law about removing children from parental custody? At all?
03/03/2010 09:43:15 PM
- 635 Views
They can take your kids from for not sending them to school but not for home schooling them
03/03/2010 10:35:48 PM
- 643 Views
Compared to not being able to feed your kids, yes, it is.
03/03/2010 03:42:58 PM
- 520 Views
yes but we don't grant political assylum for being hungry
03/03/2010 04:34:23 PM
- 606 Views
no we don't.
03/03/2010 04:50:31 PM
- 477 Views
Do you have a better system?
03/03/2010 05:05:42 PM
- 768 Views
Immigration processes could certainly use some reform
03/03/2010 05:32:22 PM
- 571 Views
The system sucks, big government typically does not function well
03/03/2010 05:48:25 PM
- 508 Views
Oh, and did you miss the part where the federal government is appealing the decision? *NM*
03/03/2010 09:40:42 AM
- 388 Views
I would consider the threat of losing my children because of my beliefs to be a real threat *NM*
03/03/2010 02:54:08 PM
- 428 Views
Doesn't matter why, but all parents should have the right to homeschool.....
03/03/2010 04:48:57 AM
- 545 Views
That whole thing is pretty silly
03/03/2010 12:18:45 PM
- 781 Views
Re: socialising.
03/03/2010 06:13:49 PM
- 741 Views
I am opposed to homeschooling but believe it should be a legal option.
03/03/2010 02:32:34 PM
- 689 Views
I think you make a good point here
03/03/2010 05:22:59 PM
- 731 Views
but...but...parents can't educate their children outside of school!!
03/03/2010 05:40:30 PM
- 657 Views
I don't agree with them I just support their right to be wrong
03/03/2010 06:04:11 PM
- 705 Views
The statistics are flawed, as I've noted above
03/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 569 Views
they tend to beat private schools as well would should flatten out the demographics
03/03/2010 07:53:38 PM
- 654 Views
Your views on this are not fact-driven
03/03/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 746 Views
No, what you're saying is that my answer isn't driven by STATISTICS.
03/03/2010 10:36:50 PM
- 673 Views
Granted, but there is no obvious source for bias
03/03/2010 10:57:19 PM
- 604 Views
You mean aside from the fact that you are already arguing about it?
04/03/2010 12:14:02 AM
- 508 Views
Yes, I mentioned this in my reply to Tom, see below...
04/03/2010 12:19:42 AM
- 645 Views
And the wikipedia article you pointed me to had a different study that contradicts your point.
03/03/2010 10:42:54 PM
- 601 Views
Religious or *moral* instruction
03/03/2010 10:49:48 PM
- 696 Views
I haven't really "met" you the way I meant it in that reply
03/03/2010 11:48:11 PM
- 496 Views
Granted but for our purposes I think people on this site would qualify
04/03/2010 12:05:03 AM
- 662 Views
Umm Massachusetts did have slavery in 1717
03/03/2010 02:55:25 PM
- 610 Views
His argument on the law of Germany is a bad one generally, though, not just for that reason.
03/03/2010 03:31:00 PM
- 526 Views
Wow....so this got the board going. A question for everyone...
03/03/2010 06:02:57 PM
- 787 Views
I think it is incumbent on the state to show that kids are being in some way harmed
03/03/2010 06:07:13 PM
- 709 Views
Interesting
03/03/2010 06:25:43 PM
- 813 Views
I never said there should be no limits on what parents should be able to do
03/03/2010 06:38:53 PM
- 761 Views
I think it's safe to say teaching your kids to be little sociopaths qualifies as harm.
03/03/2010 09:17:48 PM
- 531 Views
I think so too
03/03/2010 10:46:41 PM
- 762 Views
I think the problem there was it was seen as inherently political, that, and showing harm.
03/03/2010 11:44:21 PM
- 588 Views
Yes they do. Provided...
03/03/2010 07:04:46 PM
- 636 Views
There is a reason why education until 18 (or 16, depending) is not merely a right, but a duty.
03/03/2010 10:00:53 PM
- 698 Views
Hmmph. Inappropriate action on the part of the judge who allowed them to stay.
03/03/2010 06:22:08 PM
- 655 Views
You just skip the part where they have to show they are being persecuted
03/03/2010 06:54:20 PM
- 779 Views
As I said, most people would prefer to have their safety threatened to losing their kids. *NM*
06/03/2010 10:14:52 PM
- 451 Views
*walks in, looks around*
03/03/2010 07:52:09 PM
- 727 Views
Interesting
03/03/2010 11:02:27 PM
- 727 Views