Re: those drugs would probably still get developed, and at about the same rate as before
Isaac Send a noteboard - 06/03/2010 09:37:44 AM
What would happen to new drugs if the US congress passed a law that you could not sell drugs for more money in the US then you did in other industrialized nations? You don't think new drug development would be impacted by that? It doesn't matter where the drugs are developed what matters is where are the profits for those developments coming from.
but they wouldn't be as heavily marketed, especially to doctors and hospitals, which is where a large bulk of the non-r&d money goes from "big pharma"
It's about 20 billion a year, marketing that is, making it less than a percent of medical expenses. Anyway, that's fine in free-market, that advertising would have to be replaced at least in part with other efforts at public awareness if it was gov't run, and the money spent pays for television, radio, magazines, webistes, etc which we'd otherwise have to go without or pay tax dollars for. So ironically it pays for consumer safety reports too.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Oh my god...I'm a socialist!
- 05/03/2010 02:46:17 PM
696 Views
Just remind yourself how good the government is with its other efforts
- 05/03/2010 03:00:26 PM
408 Views
And remember that some of the biggest health insurance companies are already "non-profits".
- 05/03/2010 03:18:45 PM
392 Views
The problem with "look how bad govt. programs are" is it ignores the "starve the beast" theory.
- 05/03/2010 05:51:50 PM
495 Views
You really think taking the money oput of the system won't affect innovation?
- 05/03/2010 10:09:20 PM
393 Views
those drugs would probably still get developed, and at about the same rate as before
- 06/03/2010 07:14:07 AM
386 Views
Re: those drugs would probably still get developed, and at about the same rate as before
- 06/03/2010 09:37:44 AM
375 Views
just like taking the profit out of insurance will make healthcare affordable?
- 06/03/2010 12:12:25 PM
384 Views
No, I don't, because expired patents would drive it if nothing else did.
- 15/03/2010 06:32:55 AM
362 Views
Don't worry it isn't like we have free market economics in health care right now
- 05/03/2010 03:19:39 PM
422 Views
Hold on a sec.
- 05/03/2010 05:58:00 PM
424 Views
That's not really a socialist policy.
- 05/03/2010 03:24:59 PM
433 Views
True. The European far-right isn't really far-right (or even right) in economic terms. *NM*
- 05/03/2010 11:46:15 PM
159 Views
you don't seem to understand socialism. visit wikipedia and check it out there. *NM*
- 05/03/2010 05:16:02 PM
157 Views
Making healthcare universally accessible is not socialist...
- 05/03/2010 05:29:16 PM
392 Views
It is universally accessible now
- 05/03/2010 05:43:52 PM
409 Views
Ah, like the Rolls Royce is universally acceptable.
- 05/03/2010 05:52:59 PM
386 Views
BS *NM*
- 05/03/2010 06:08:52 PM
146 Views
BSS
- 05/03/2010 06:28:15 PM
381 Views
Random Thoughts
- 05/03/2010 06:31:00 PM
375 Views
For profit isn't automatically BAD, just an unwise panacea for essential services.
- 05/03/2010 05:45:36 PM
450 Views
Government run isn't automatically BAD, just an unwise panacea for essential services.
- 05/03/2010 06:30:14 PM
376 Views
Universal healthcare is good...
- 05/03/2010 10:13:01 PM
411 Views
great I was really hoping we could hear from a moron and you seem to fit the bill
- 05/03/2010 11:39:15 PM
396 Views
I think he was joking RT - note the
at the end of the message
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 09:23:45 AM
205 Views
at the end of the message
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 09:23:45 AM
205 Views
How does "Don't worry, it will never happen in America either way" sound?
- 05/03/2010 11:49:23 PM
395 Views

