Active Users:684 Time:10/06/2026 06:18:51 AM
Not really. Tom Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 10:58:13 PM
Small businesses would not really be hit due to the number of jobs that would need to be created. Larger businesses would be encouraged to expand. It's possible that a new facility would not even be necessary, as long as net jobs are created.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A simple proposal. - 08/03/2010 10:26:32 PM 415 Views
Wouldn't that pretty much screw over what existing business there are? - 08/03/2010 10:47:20 PM 186 Views
Not really. - 08/03/2010 10:58:13 PM 191 Views
Wouldn't all the current manufacturing businesses just spin-off mini-factories? - 08/03/2010 10:54:32 PM 161 Views
No, it would have to be new NET jobs. - 08/03/2010 10:59:24 PM 169 Views
uhm, not that you don't have a reasonable idea - 08/03/2010 10:59:32 PM 193 Views
It's Obama's fault because he can't grasp how jobs are created. - 09/03/2010 12:46:02 AM 167 Views
but does not Congress write/pass legislation? - 09/03/2010 01:33:25 AM 159 Views
Let's not be naive. The President has the power to introduce and direct legislation. - 09/03/2010 03:00:05 AM 152 Views
that's fair enough - 09/03/2010 03:12:18 AM 157 Views
A good President gets rid of gridlock - 09/03/2010 03:38:52 AM 148 Views
More government hoop-jumping is not a long-term solution to anything. - 08/03/2010 11:31:11 PM 185 Views
Ultimately, no corporate tax would be a good thing. - 09/03/2010 12:47:34 AM 181 Views
That would have been my suggestion. - 09/03/2010 01:06:41 AM 166 Views
or we could just throw out most taxes all together - 09/03/2010 01:36:02 AM 160 Views
And that is what most economists prefer - 09/03/2010 04:48:53 PM 157 Views

Reply to Message