uhm, not that you don't have a reasonable idea
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 10:59:32 PM
but how is this the obama administration's fault? While I understand that a strong president can push policy through, is it not Congress that writes policy and law? I'm not saying that Obama can't be doing more, but I simply do not understand why people shove everything (even factors that are out of BOTH branches' control) entirely onto the reigning administration. I'm not trying to get all pissy or anything with you, it's just a trend I see across the board on all sides that has never made sense to me.
And before you accuse me of Obama-ism, I said the same thing during Bush's administration
Of course, I could still be entirely off base and both presidents were 100% responsible for everything that went wrong during their administrations. I just don't see why people blame presidents for 100% of everything , even when problems clearly reside in congress, or out side of anyone's control at all. They certainly bear some responsibility, but not all of it. Congress deserves their fair share, as do all involved parties in any policy.
And before you accuse me of Obama-ism, I said the same thing during Bush's administration
Of course, I could still be entirely off base and both presidents were 100% responsible for everything that went wrong during their administrations. I just don't see why people blame presidents for 100% of everything , even when problems clearly reside in congress, or out side of anyone's control at all. They certainly bear some responsibility, but not all of it. Congress deserves their fair share, as do all involved parties in any policy.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
A simple proposal.
- 08/03/2010 10:26:32 PM
415 Views
Wouldn't that pretty much screw over what existing business there are?
- 08/03/2010 10:47:20 PM
186 Views
Not really.
- 08/03/2010 10:58:13 PM
191 Views
I don't think that deals with my objection.
- 08/03/2010 11:27:48 PM
185 Views
Sure it does. Expand or die is pretty much what it says. Your objections are noted, and ignored.
- 09/03/2010 12:43:53 AM
175 Views
"Expand or die" I like that
- 09/03/2010 01:32:19 AM
181 Views
I'd be fine with corporations not paying taxes if they didn't have so many rights.
- 12/03/2010 03:05:24 AM
152 Views
Noted and ignored rather than addressed?
Punishing past success seems a strange idea though
- 09/03/2010 10:54:25 AM
163 Views
Punishing past success seems a strange idea though
- 09/03/2010 10:54:25 AM
163 Views
Wouldn't all the current manufacturing businesses just spin-off mini-factories?
- 08/03/2010 10:54:32 PM
161 Views
uhm, not that you don't have a reasonable idea
- 08/03/2010 10:59:32 PM
193 Views
It's Obama's fault because he can't grasp how jobs are created.
- 09/03/2010 12:46:02 AM
167 Views
but does not Congress write/pass legislation?
- 09/03/2010 01:33:25 AM
159 Views
Let's not be naive. The President has the power to introduce and direct legislation.
- 09/03/2010 03:00:05 AM
152 Views
More government hoop-jumping is not a long-term solution to anything.
- 08/03/2010 11:31:11 PM
185 Views
Ultimately, no corporate tax would be a good thing.
- 09/03/2010 12:47:34 AM
181 Views
That would have been my suggestion.
- 09/03/2010 01:06:41 AM
166 Views
or we could just throw out most taxes all together
- 09/03/2010 01:36:02 AM
160 Views
That wouldn't actually raise that much money, even if they currently paid no taxes.
- 09/03/2010 01:44:28 AM
167 Views
It's why the personal income tax is the primary source of government revenue.
- 09/03/2010 02:58:20 AM
179 Views
