Active Users:684 Time:10/06/2026 06:18:51 AM
No, it would have to be new NET jobs. Tom Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 10:59:24 PM
If, after all that reorganization, the company hasn't added enough new jobs in the aggregate (either because they fired old people to "make" the new jobs) they wouldn't get the benefit.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A simple proposal. - 08/03/2010 10:26:32 PM 415 Views
Wouldn't that pretty much screw over what existing business there are? - 08/03/2010 10:47:20 PM 186 Views
Not really. - 08/03/2010 10:58:13 PM 191 Views
Wouldn't all the current manufacturing businesses just spin-off mini-factories? - 08/03/2010 10:54:32 PM 161 Views
No, it would have to be new NET jobs. - 08/03/2010 10:59:24 PM 170 Views
uhm, not that you don't have a reasonable idea - 08/03/2010 10:59:32 PM 193 Views
It's Obama's fault because he can't grasp how jobs are created. - 09/03/2010 12:46:02 AM 167 Views
but does not Congress write/pass legislation? - 09/03/2010 01:33:25 AM 159 Views
Let's not be naive. The President has the power to introduce and direct legislation. - 09/03/2010 03:00:05 AM 152 Views
that's fair enough - 09/03/2010 03:12:18 AM 157 Views
A good President gets rid of gridlock - 09/03/2010 03:38:52 AM 148 Views
More government hoop-jumping is not a long-term solution to anything. - 08/03/2010 11:31:11 PM 185 Views
Ultimately, no corporate tax would be a good thing. - 09/03/2010 12:47:34 AM 181 Views
That would have been my suggestion. - 09/03/2010 01:06:41 AM 166 Views
or we could just throw out most taxes all together - 09/03/2010 01:36:02 AM 160 Views
And that is what most economists prefer - 09/03/2010 04:48:53 PM 157 Views

Reply to Message