I won't take the debate (I simply don't have the time), but I will say this makes me happy for you. America is actually moving in the direction of what I (in my warped, Scandinavian brain, obviously) think of as a civilised country. I did not think that would ever happen.
I saw what happened in Massachusetts first hand. The space between official and actual is quite great. Personally, I do find this a step in the correct direction as I believe in universal health coverage along the French, Swiss, and Scandinavian models. In particular I like the part about not denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.
Still, I am extremely worried about cost control.
I agree with you but ultimately I think reform had to happen now in some form. Otherwise I don't think it ever would have happened and we would be completely crushed financially by the current behemoth that is our healthcare system. Not only were people being unfairly dropped from or denied coverage, but the system was well on it's way to bankrupting the U.S. in the near-future.
I know alot of the cost control is contingent-based on actions taken by our leaders 10-20 years down the line, and that is a scary thought, but if we didn't get the ball rolling on reform now when was it going to happen? There is no fiscal republican leadership to be spoken of anymore, so who was going to stop our healthcare system from crippling us permanently if nothing was done now?
The C.B.O. scored it well and almost every American will be insured. I can't see the cost-control criticisms holding enough weight in the face of that. Especially considering the system was already a runaway financial freight train.
Ezra Klein is attempting to explain the actual nuts and bolts of the bill today at his WaPo blog....
Formerly DannyBoy31
No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
1506 Views
Meh
- 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
844 Views
Re: Meh
- 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
866 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
- 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
960 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
- 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
801 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
- 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
827 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
- 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
758 Views
A question?
- 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
855 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
- 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
892 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
- 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
995 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha 
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
936 Views
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
936 Views
why? 
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
410 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
410 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
388 Views
This.
- 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
861 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
- 23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
920 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
- 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
426 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
831 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
1016 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
824 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
872 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
897 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
- 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
934 Views
I think reform had to start now.
- 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
1020 Views
That's a good column.
- 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
907 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
- 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
948 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
843 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
816 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
- 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
815 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
- 22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
834 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
846 Views
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
846 Views
As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands *NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
385 Views
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
385 Views
I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
- 23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
928 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
- 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
852 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
- 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
941 Views
bingo
- 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
967 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
- 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
853 Views
It is a good start
- 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
796 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
- 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
937 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
- 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
829 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
- 24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
962 Views