Active Users:1944 Time:01/08/2026 04:21:05 PM
On a certain level I do agree with you Brian Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM
The populous is often ignorant and ill-informed (given the vast quantities of information people now have to pick through to find the unbiased facts, and how few people do so, I still think these are valid labels).

Theoretically, the politicians should have a knowledge/expert-base available to make decision that the ignorant lay person would err on out of ignorance. While they should take the desires and motivations of their constituency into account, it is also their responsibility to use their (theoretical) greater knowledge to make a better and more informed decision than your average grocer would make. In fact, I would say it is a failure of the politician to make a decision that appeases his constituency rather than helps them. Not to say that the desires of his constituents should not be considered. Just that I think it is a disservice to merely appease your "clients" than actually serve them.

But I'm going into a medical profession, so I might have an unrealistic point of view on the matter.

I think people on the whole are idiots that rarely know what they are talking about and prefer to hear biased propaganda from one side or the other of an argument rather than unbiased facts that allow them to come to their own conclusion. Generally speaking I think it's pretty fair to say that I think the average intelligence level of people in this country, and really worldwide, is nothing to be proud of.

That said....I think that in a majority of situations the people that represent us in Congress should be primarily concerned with what their constituents want, because they were elected to represent and speak for their constituents. Obviously they have to do so within reason, but in situations where the public has had plenty of time to make up their mind about a specific bill or issue and you go against your constituent's desires, then I think you are doing them a disservice.

I don't know that any health care bill was ever going to get wide spread support though, so I'll take this one, and hope that the areas where I personally think there needs to be a lot more work done get the attention they need, and that the health care system gets fixed once and for all.
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1543 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 886 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 906 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 1002 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 851 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 874 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 806 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 919 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 973 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 915 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 965 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 1036 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 875 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 857 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 981 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 434 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 411 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 906 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 1152 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 920 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 489 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 430 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1359 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 1019 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 863 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 849 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 975 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 447 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 391 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 861 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 867 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 1051 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 858 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 882 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 893 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 992 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 1072 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 955 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 887 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 873 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 872 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 918 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 814 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 990 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 1010 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 913 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 859 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 958 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 842 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 816 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 947 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 854 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 924 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 375 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 957 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 992 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 873 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 864 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 976 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 784 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 819 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 1028 Views

Reply to Message