Active Users:561 Time:02/06/2026 08:46:58 AM
I was thinking about this after posting LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM
I think part of the problem is the difference between what constituent want THEN as opposed to NOW.

It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".

But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1506 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 844 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 866 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 961 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 801 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 827 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 758 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 882 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 928 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 855 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 892 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 995 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 807 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 802 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 936 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 410 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 388 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 861 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 1120 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 881 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 466 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 402 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1302 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 975 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 817 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 813 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 920 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 426 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 368 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 820 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 831 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 1016 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 824 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 832 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 844 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 934 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 1020 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 907 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 843 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 816 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 815 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 852 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 768 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 941 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 967 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 853 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 809 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 913 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 796 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 781 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 884 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 813 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 875 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 352 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 907 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 937 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 841 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 829 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 929 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 746 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 771 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 981 Views

Reply to Message