By a good margin. Setting aside the political difficulty of trying to argue for a larger donut hole or reduced coverage (since Republicans are consistently better at framing debates than Dems, hence the difficulty passing a healthcare people most people voted for in '08 ) they don't have the votes to override the inevitable veto. The House arithmetic is no better: There are 253 Dems, 178 Republicans and 4 vacancies, so reaching the magical 290 vote override number on a partyline vote would require Republicans to win 112 seats this November, 108 of which are held by Democrats. Sure, some blue dogs and other conservative Dems will defect, but suggesting THAT many will is absurd.
So, the real question is: If Republicans are running in November on "vote for me and we'll repeal this bill111" aren't they pretty much lying to voters faces? It says awful things about this countrys citizens that it will probably work anyway (in the sense of their goal of getting elected, not repealing the bill, which is laughable. )
So, the real question is: If Republicans are running in November on "vote for me and we'll repeal this bill111" aren't they pretty much lying to voters faces? It says awful things about this countrys citizens that it will probably work anyway (in the sense of their goal of getting elected, not repealing the bill, which is laughable. )
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
1565 Views
Meh
- 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
914 Views
Re: Meh
- 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
929 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
- 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
1024 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
- 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
879 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
- 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
903 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
- 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
834 Views
A question?
- 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
943 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
- 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
1001 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
- 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
1060 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
1019 Views
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
1019 Views
why?
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
445 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
445 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
426 Views
This.
- 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
926 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
- 23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
984 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
- 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
461 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
891 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
1073 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
880 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
960 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
982 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November.
- 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM
910 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67.
- 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM
922 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
- 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
1018 Views
I think reform had to start now.
- 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
1102 Views
That's a good column.
- 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
984 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
- 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
1027 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
910 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
900 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
- 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
908 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
- 22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
962 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
930 Views
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
930 Views
As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
415 Views
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
415 Views
I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
- 23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
1004 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
- 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
950 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
- 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
1019 Views
bingo
- 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
1038 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
- 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
948 Views
It is a good start
- 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
866 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
- 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
1032 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
- 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
889 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
- 24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
1024 Views
