Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
Inigo Montoya Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
You may be right about reform having to start now, too. I'm rather torn on the issue, myself - the bill as passed is not that bad in itself, but it *is* bad, even disastrous, if it's the only bill that's going to be passed for the next five or ten years. So if the polarization and ugliness that this bill has sown is such that Congress waits years before trying to pass additional reforms, I'm afraid it wasn't worth that. As such, I still think a more bipartisan bill should've been possible.
Yea, that's the thing. This bill doesn't do nearly enough on it's own to truly change or save the system financially. But I have to think it makes it a hell of alot easier going foward to make more impactful reforms down the line now that the initial hurdle has been cleared. Especially if it can be explained in terms to the public that the figures (like Klein uses that graph to illustrate) are only a drop in the bucket of our total healthcare spending. When people see that this bill hasn't taken away any "freedom" as the crazy, loud right would have us believe and has given almost everyone access to care when they're sick, I think further reform will be much more palatable to the people down the road. Especially if some of the cost-saving pilot programs included in this bill are actually coming up with real results that can be shown demonstrably to save money.
Formerly DannyBoy31
No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
1419 Views
Meh
- 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
762 Views
Re: Meh
- 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
774 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
- 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
873 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
- 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
709 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
- 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
741 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
- 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
676 Views
A question?
- 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
769 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
- 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
797 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
- 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
909 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
849 Views
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
849 Views
why?
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
370 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
370 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
351 Views
This.
- 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
766 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
- 23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
824 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
- 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
386 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
745 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
926 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
737 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
782 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
810 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
- 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
850 Views
I think reform had to start now.
- 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
939 Views
That's a good column.
- 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
827 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
- 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
856 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
762 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
727 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
- 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
727 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
- 22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
733 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
775 Views
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
775 Views
As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
342 Views
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
342 Views
I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
- 23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
842 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
- 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
767 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
- 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
859 Views
bingo
- 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
882 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
- 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
755 Views
It is a good start
- 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
717 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
- 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
845 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
- 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
740 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
- 24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
878 Views
