In part because "black music" is an antiquated term at best and quite insulting in several contexts. The black paint would be construed by several as being related to blackface attire and that is very controversial here and has been for at least one generation, if not two.
Interesting how social mores differ from culture to culture, though.
Interesting how social mores differ from culture to culture, though.
I'm reminded of the recent kerfluffle over the Down Under minstrel show, how strongly Harry Connick Jr. reacted to it on the scene and how baffled everyone else was at the time. I can see how Connick, as a New Orleans musician and son of a LA Supreme Court Justice, would have a very visceral reaction to a 21st Century minstrel show (and I believe the American controversy over that is more than just a couple generations old. ) I can also see how people overseas would be completely at a loss to understand it (though, in all fairness, it shouldn't be as hard to grasp in Australia. ) The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music, but I can see how Europe wouldn't be as sensitive (or hypersensitive) to the concept as America because the legacy is very different.
I'd say it's "quasi-racist" because musical tastes and/or talent are not racially defined, though obviously cultural predispositions exist. It's all well to say Mozart was the first rock star, but while he might have picked up rock had he been exposed to it, he never was and thus never composed any.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
- 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
2919 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
- 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
896 Views
Uh.
- 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
987 Views
Re: Uh.
- 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
929 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
848 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
954 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
786 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
742 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
- 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
471 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
- 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
832 Views
Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
978 Views
Re: Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
781 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
- 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
816 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
- 29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
805 Views
I don't see it
- 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
845 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
- 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
820 Views
It would not float here in the US
- 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
838 Views
Agreed.
- 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
1000 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
- 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
855 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
- 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
1081 Views
MOBO
- 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
790 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
- 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
837 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
- 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
827 Views
Agreed
- 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
861 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
433 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
1092 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
- 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
796 Views
