Active Users:335 Time:17/06/2025 10:11:27 AM
I was thinking about this after posting LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM
I think part of the problem is the difference between what constituent want THEN as opposed to NOW.

It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".

But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1325 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 675 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 660 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 789 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 615 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 643 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 573 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 708 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 734 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 657 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 702 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 816 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 615 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 619 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 770 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 323 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 317 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 680 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 931 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 699 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 392 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 316 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1095 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 800 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 639 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 629 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 724 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 342 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 276 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 643 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 655 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 837 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 641 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 650 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 645 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 757 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 827 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 730 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 655 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 626 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 644 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 653 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 572 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 763 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 785 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 659 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 634 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 728 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 614 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 617 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 678 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 638 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 693 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 276 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 731 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 747 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 659 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 633 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 737 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 585 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 586 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 778 Views

Reply to Message