Active Users:499 Time:07/09/2025 05:54:30 AM
I wondered that too Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM
Unless I've got it backwards, it looks like that would make more sense.


But it's still a bit off I think. I would expect someone of that height and weight to be a 12.


But if the whole focus is to reassure women in America what the "averages" in America are, it's rather misleading to use the higher-numbered system I think.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1413 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 718 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 787 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 675 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 740 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 762 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 809 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 870 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 717 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 705 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 945 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 806 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 771 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 761 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 782 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 725 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 694 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 709 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 841 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 793 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 825 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 726 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 675 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 702 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 657 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 717 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 814 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 929 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 794 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1167 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 735 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 759 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 718 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 754 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 678 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 683 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 774 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 854 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 380 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 698 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 375 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 776 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 762 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 396 Views

Reply to Message