Unless I've got it backwards, it looks like that would make more sense.
But it's still a bit off I think. I would expect someone of that height and weight to be a 12.
But if the whole focus is to reassure women in America what the "averages" in America are, it's rather misleading to use the higher-numbered system I think.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America.
- 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM
1546 Views
Scary but hardly surprising
- 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM
814 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising
- 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM
882 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject.
- 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM
977 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject.
- 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM
808 Views
Hrm
- 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM
907 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack.
- 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM
878 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective.
- 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM
861 Views
Yes.
- 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM
784 Views
Are they British sizes?
- 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM
818 Views
It would make more sense...
- 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM
750 Views
I wondered that too
- 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM
826 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6?
- 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM
923 Views
No, American.
- 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM
1281 Views
Er, that was me.
- 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM
859 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge?
- 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM
856 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts.
- 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM
784 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think...
- 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM
896 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM*
- 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM
419 Views
I actually
- 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM
880 Views

*NM*