Unless I've got it backwards, it looks like that would make more sense.
But it's still a bit off I think. I would expect someone of that height and weight to be a 12.
But if the whole focus is to reassure women in America what the "averages" in America are, it's rather misleading to use the higher-numbered system I think.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America.
- 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM
1522 Views
Scary but hardly surprising
- 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM
793 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising
- 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM
859 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject.
- 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM
956 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject.
- 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM
788 Views
Hrm
- 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM
889 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack.
- 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM
857 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective.
- 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM
833 Views
Yes.
- 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM
761 Views
Are they British sizes?
- 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM
789 Views
It would make more sense...
- 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM
728 Views
I wondered that too
- 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM
809 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6?
- 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM
894 Views
No, American.
- 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM
1249 Views
Er, that was me.
- 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM
830 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge?
- 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM
834 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts.
- 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM
767 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think...
- 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM
871 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM*
- 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM
409 Views
I actually
- 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM
855 Views

*NM*