Active Users:251 Time:04/05/2024 05:35:26 AM
A wizard did it Tom Send a noteboard - 18/05/2017 06:16:26 AM

Seriously, that's hilarious. Maybe absolute zero in Star Trek is -350, you know, just so people know it's not supposed to be real?

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
TNG S02E12: The Royale, OR, How Many Scientific Errors are Feasible in Five Minutes? - 18/05/2017 04:50:36 AM 355 Views
A wizard did it - 18/05/2017 06:16:26 AM 243 Views
Star Trek shows usually do a pretty good job with stuff like this - 18/05/2017 03:23:37 PM 189 Views
They must have been on strike that week. *NM* - 18/05/2017 06:13:43 PM 84 Views
Physics in almost all "Super Hero" movies drives me batty. - 18/05/2017 04:21:49 PM 162 Views
Presumably Superman moves downward when catching Lois to prevent fatal deceleration. - 18/05/2017 06:16:36 PM 150 Views
Even just bending the knees and letting the arms drop a little would make a huge difference *NM* - 18/05/2017 07:03:09 PM 125 Views
Not enough. Not nearly enough. *NM* - 18/05/2017 07:08:30 PM 108 Views
If you look at the math you might be surprised - 19/05/2017 02:48:28 AM 144 Views
It's not just Superman, though. - 18/05/2017 07:08:01 PM 259 Views
Suspension of disbelief? - 18/05/2017 07:31:51 PM 165 Views
Oh my gosh aero we're talking about things falling not being suspended. - 18/05/2017 09:04:31 PM 165 Views
OOOOOOooooooooh! I get it now. - 18/05/2017 10:00:21 PM 139 Views
You also see this type of thing.... - 18/05/2017 10:45:59 PM 159 Views
And this is why early TNG is so much fun..... - 18/05/2017 10:42:24 PM 153 Views
Artifical Gravity, FTL, Star Trek Transporter, Cylons.... - 18/05/2017 11:09:19 PM 158 Views
I hate it when massive plot holes are excused because it is science fiction - 19/05/2017 03:11:21 AM 146 Views

Reply to Message