Not with any of your points about her age, though. It's true of course that 12 would be unusually young for sexual activity, but it's a normal enough age to experience sexual attraction, especially considering how girls are entering puberty earlier than a few generations ago. More to the point, though, while the term may be 'sexual orientation', it refers more broadly to romantic interests. And it's perfectly normal even for children of considerably lower ages to experience romantic attraction. So it's really not that absurd for a child to consider herself a lesbian even before puberty. There may be cases in which that shifts during or after puberty, but that doesn't mean the child's environment should completely ignore it.
So then she's making a straw man argument, or you are. Her speech was all sorts of nonsense about how she is so wonderful and also a lesbian, so therefore there is nothing wrong with being a lesbian. IDK what the Mormon doctrine is on temptation and sins and so forth, but in traditional religion, there is also nothing wrong with having sexual feelings or interests or attraction. The sin, the "horrible sinner" issue to which she referred pertains to a category of specific activities, ALL of which are way beyond the pale for 12 year olds. In other words, if she's right, everyone owes Milo Yiannopolis a massive apology and a book deal.
I cannot fully articulate the enormity of your lack of a right to tell people that their 12 year-olds are old enough to hear about sex. It is an individual level of awareness and capacity, that should be determined by people who have the longest and closest degree of acquaintance with said children and presumed to have their best interests at heart. In other words, their parents. If parents think their kids are old enough to hear a talk about why lesbians are awesome, that's their right. No one else has the right to subject their children to such a talk however, absent the parent's prior approval. As I said in the original post, no one brought their kid to that event expecting to have them exposed to that, and the speaker and her idiot parents had no right to impose it on them.
Experience with that practice inspired people to start raising the ages of consent and marriage in the civilized world.
By way of illustration, Catholic canon law has 7 years old as the 'age of reason' which is the minimum requirement for things like confirmation and confession. I dare say it's very exceptional to be confirmed at 7, but I for one was confirmed in sixth grade, the customary age around here, when most of my classmates were 11 or 12, and I was 10. Similarly, bar mitzvahs and bat miztvahs are done at ages 12 or 13. I think it's safe to say that Western religion generally does attach value to the opinion of a 12 year old.
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*