Active Users:183 Time:19/05/2024 12:46:11 PM
Your replies do show a large streak of Slytherinesque views. I think you were mishoused. The Shrike Send a noteboard - 26/06/2017 06:06:09 PM

View original post
View original postPersonally I enjoyed Draco's redemption story throughout the entire series. And then there was Snape as well. Complicated people. Much more interesting than a lot of Gryffindors. I mean if you want terrible Gryffindors we have Percy Weasley. Turned his back on his family.

There are plenty of terrible people in every house. It's simply that Slytherin has a vastly disproportionate amount with practically no good people to balance it out. And sure, Snape was interesting (Malfoy didn't get enough attention to be), but that doesn't make him good. Pick up a good biography of your vicious dictator of choice and you'll see interesting in spades.
View original postThe problem with the test and the books with regards to houses is that even though I think I should have been Ravenclaw, Rowling never fleshed out Hufflepuff or Ravenclaw properly. So we don't have enough of them to see what they are truly like. I think I did the calculations once that there are roughly 40 people per class at Hogwarts - so about 280 people in the school - and Rowling just never felt the need to tell a story other than through the eyes of Gryffindor and their antagonists Slytherin. She would have done better to make a more nuanced story that showed evil/good people from all the houses rather than the clear only good/only evil duality she had going on. But this did begin as a story for children before progressing into what it became in later books.

Ravenclaw has Luna and is a bit fleshed out. Hufflepuff exists largely to be the butt of jokes. I agree that some more depth would have been preferable, but Rowling did a remarkable job of developing the books' maturity as the series progresses.
View original postDo I think any one of the houses is the best? Clearly not. And that kind of chauvinistic attitude is really so old school. Reactionary even. Looks like you should be happy you're in Gryffindor. But you sound like you could have placed in Slytherin too.

The text supports it. Slytherin is full of terrible people.
View original postBTW - you forgot Harry's son who placed into Slytherin - Albus Severus Potter.

I refuse to acknowledge the drivel that is the epilogue or the even worse drivel that is CURSED CHILD. Dreadful writing.
View original postP.S. What do you have against using the word 'Philosopher' with its medieval alchemist connotations? A sorcerer is not a person of intellect.

Nothing, but the title in the U.S. is not Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. You should ask Scholastic, not me.
View original postP. P. S. - you seem to have gone to a lot of trouble to try to justify your so-called Gryffindorness. You sure you didn't get placed into Hufflepuff? You can always do the test again if you need to feel better.

Moralizing, judgemental attitudes come naturally to me. I'm a Gryffindor through and through. But Hufflepuff is a lovely house and had the protagonist of the only good Harry Potter film, so I'm not insulted by the insinuation.

Reply to message
What the hell is with people's fondness for Slytherin? - 26/06/2017 09:48:07 AM 974 Views
I got placed into Slytherin at Pottermore back in the day. - 26/06/2017 01:30:13 PM 601 Views
Re: I got placed into Slytherin at Pottermore back in the day. - 26/06/2017 05:43:34 PM 595 Views
Your replies do show a large streak of Slytherinesque views. I think you were mishoused. - 26/06/2017 06:06:09 PM 616 Views
Nah. I have vague glimmerings of a conscience. Disqualifying trait for House Sociopath. *NM* - 26/06/2017 06:08:44 PM 344 Views
Ah I see. You're in denial. In the closet as it were. - 26/06/2017 06:27:37 PM 433 Views
Yet you're studying for the bar so you can join Profession Sociopath. - 26/06/2017 07:56:47 PM 562 Views
Ugh. Don't remind me. *NM* - 26/06/2017 07:58:03 PM 328 Views
Meanwhile future "sociopath" - 28/06/2017 12:20:27 PM 474 Views
I'm going into public defense. Don't be too proud of yourself. - 28/06/2017 08:31:04 PM 585 Views
Just a self-righteous and masochistic form of sociopath. *NM* - 28/06/2017 10:05:18 PM 414 Views
But intensely charitable in its sociopathy! - 28/06/2017 10:54:14 PM 452 Views
Voldemort came from Slytherin. He was awesome. - 26/06/2017 01:50:46 PM 542 Views
*NM* - 26/06/2017 05:44:33 PM 361 Views
One of the rather few things in the series that I'd say Rowling got wrong... - 26/06/2017 07:32:43 PM 531 Views
I agree with most of this. - 27/06/2017 01:03:19 AM 629 Views
As a fellow "Never Slytherin"... - 27/06/2017 12:22:17 AM 784 Views
Re: As a fellow "Never Slytherin"... - 27/06/2017 01:15:15 AM 543 Views
Perhaps the houses - 28/06/2017 01:44:35 AM 541 Views
Anti-hype? - 27/06/2017 10:35:22 AM 539 Views
Ok, so, everybody beat me to it - 27/06/2017 10:45:33 AM 523 Views
Nossy you are our hufflepuff - 28/06/2017 01:47:40 AM 509 Views
Re: Anti-hype? - 27/06/2017 03:24:12 PM 553 Views
Re: Anti-hype? - 28/06/2017 03:21:59 AM 397 Views
Re: Anti-hype? - 28/06/2017 01:14:09 PM 464 Views
Stop it, you are meant to enjoy the books not analyze them to death. - 28/06/2017 01:40:41 AM 455 Views
I don't watch anime. RWBY is safe. *NM* - 28/06/2017 03:12:56 AM 274 Views
Hun, that product is made in America it is not Anime - 28/06/2017 03:17:45 AM 464 Views
That's anime. I don't watch anime or its derivatives. But if you want me to criticize it... *NM* - 28/06/2017 03:23:01 AM 316 Views
Perhaps you should watch it - 28/06/2017 03:29:59 AM 410 Views

Reply to Message