Active Users:642 Time:28/02/2026 05:37:25 AM
wrong damookster Send a noteboard - 08/07/2017 05:21:00 AM

It is especially annoying since I read somewhere that Spider-man in the comics was actually a college student when he got bit.

Like aero said, he was in high school in the origin story released in the summer of '62. It wasn't until three years later that he started college.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Spiderman: Homecoming (minor spoilers, maybe?) - 07/07/2017 06:20:53 PM 667 Views
It's Spider-MAN, not Spider-boy - 08/07/2017 03:53:57 AM 622 Views
Oh! I forgot! - 08/07/2017 04:11:50 AM 458 Views
wrong - 08/07/2017 05:21:00 AM 445 Views
It was a Gregg Esterbrook column. Never trust a liberal. - 09/07/2017 12:02:13 AM 463 Views
I stopped reading Easterbrook years ago - 10/07/2017 08:23:28 PM 375 Views
mook is correct you are worng - 10/07/2017 08:18:20 PM 391 Views
Still haven't seen it, feel free to spoil me anyway - 08/07/2017 04:52:32 AM 470 Views
Spider Man dies - 10/07/2017 08:19:06 PM 401 Views
He and his movies should have "died" a long time ago..... - 10/07/2017 08:20:41 PM 375 Views
Infinite - 10/07/2017 09:14:30 PM 730 Views
That is the problem with a teenage super hero - 13/07/2017 01:34:48 PM 453 Views
And like magic - 13/07/2017 01:58:23 PM 366 Views
Why do that when you can just recast and reboot and fill seats? - 19/07/2017 01:32:14 PM 330 Views
Either way works - 19/07/2017 03:18:40 PM 384 Views
Why does he have to be a teen? Hasn't the character succeed commercially past high school? - 14/07/2017 05:33:29 AM 520 Views
That was the major innovation of Spiderman - 14/07/2017 02:18:04 PM 425 Views
Re: So they should just make charcters that you relate to - 19/07/2017 01:43:47 PM 335 Views
Re: So they should just make charcters that you relate to? - 20/07/2017 12:37:34 AM 373 Views
delete stupid double post option would be nice *NM* - 20/07/2017 12:38:33 AM 178 Views
Hun stop your wish fufillment - 10/07/2017 08:43:00 PM 413 Views

Reply to Message