Active Users:415 Time:01/05/2025 05:05:55 PM
Regarding phobia Jeordam Send a noteboard - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM

Specifically regarding phobia...which is defined as an irrational fear or aversion to something....

I'm just wondering where the line is drawn in declaring that someone has a phobia to something as opposed to just doesn't like/approve of it. Where is that line? (Granted, the logical question to follow up on that is how does one feel that they have the ability/knowledge to determine someone else has reached phobic levels.) Coincidentally, I watched that movie from the 90's Arachnophobia (great flick by the way). In that movie, the main character has an actual issue with spiders...to the point that he freezes up when confronted with them. Through a normal day, he is a husband, father, successful doctor, but when confronted with spiders he just locks up. His behavior changes. I've read Cannoli's writings for probably over a decade now. Seen him interact with a very diverse group here. I don't see a behavior change that would demonstrate an active phobia.... I see him not agreeing with an individuals actions/life. I see him not agreeing with a social stance/belief system. I don't see a behavior change or irrational actions spurred by that fear. I don't see violence (which can be a fear response).

Here's a personal example. I don't eat sea food. From any type of fish to shellfish to any invertebrate. Not my thing. I live less than 10 minutes from the ocean. Fresh and very good seafood is but moments away from me at any given moment. I don't like it. Is this a phobia?

I know how I would characterize it, but how would you? In today's day and age, disagreement or non-approval has been equated with being a phobia or hate. They are not the same.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1179 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 514 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 480 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 491 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 263 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 491 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 258 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 542 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 474 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 500 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 515 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 503 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 491 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 438 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 464 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 518 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 508 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 502 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 480 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 522 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 590 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 471 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 484 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 512 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 482 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 456 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 495 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 492 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 475 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 478 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 493 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 504 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 501 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 489 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 296 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 488 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 483 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 248 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 499 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 457 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 468 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 517 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 467 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 538 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 499 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 491 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 555 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 458 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 507 Views

Reply to Message