Active Users:373 Time:05/05/2024 10:04:24 AM
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM


It isn't supposed to do so in any way involving government action, true, but even the most liberal of societies police speech. Meaning, you can say whatever you like, but there are and should be societal consequences. Make racist anti-Jewish rants? I'm not going to invite you to my parties.

Antisemitophobe! But, yeah, this is exactly how it goes and what is meant by freedom of association. Freedom of association is the only acceptable check on free speech. And it HAS to go both ways. Whether the freedom to disallow anti-semites OR Jews from your association. If you don't have to write "Happy Birthday Adolf Hitler" on a cake (and you shouldn't), you also don't have to put two groom or two bride figures on top of a wedding cake.
Nor will I patronize your business. As a potential employer, I might not hire you. To say that "freedom of speech" is somehow equal to "freedom from consequences for my speech" is ludicrous. A sufficiently liberal society would be reluctant to use such tools; confining it to only those who represent the most extreme and/or dangerous views. And shouldn't be used to silence those with "controversial" views, as you should have a right to "speak". But again, as with many things in life, you should have the freedom to do it, but are not free from the consequences.

Exactly. So long as the consequences are the result of individual choice, and not legislation or judicial action.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1035 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 378 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 349 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 361 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 203 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 362 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 202 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 403 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 333 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 381 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 387 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 366 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 362 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 308 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 363 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 345 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 378 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 376 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 352 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 380 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 439 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 328 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 349 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 363 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 344 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 334 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 356 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 351 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 351 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 338 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 349 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 360 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 366 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 367 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 239 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 347 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 348 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 192 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 375 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 333 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 342 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 370 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 331 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 407 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 364 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 350 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 417 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 329 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 375 Views

Reply to Message