Active Users:304 Time:29/04/2024 03:54:42 PM
Yes, and for your mental health you should probably skip the rest of the answer. Roland00 Send a noteboard - 16/12/2018 04:06:29 AM

Though I would argue it is not about "hard sci-fi" rules but instead internally consistent rules. So Aerocontrols I will pivot and let a short video essay explain what I mean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxuK4NQ2NHk

----

Sci-Fi movies have to be careful with how they construct the internal rules and especially the first few minutes / first few parts of the story for these first few parts of the story "anchor" the viewer and their expectations. If something seems inconsistently hard sci-fi and not hard sci-fi it breaks the illusion, it takes the viewer out of the total attentional engagement they just had for they now have to think about what are the rules for this reality. Shifting the rules of a story breaks the verisimilitude and triggers an effect in the viewer that is similar to "the uncanny valley."

This is because film is by its very nature "fiction" (even when it is a documentary) you have to turn off part of your brain that says stop paying the external world as your live it (like I am in this room) and anchor your attention to something else and give your attention to this other thing.

----------

There are more detailed explanations of why this uncanny valley occurs but it requires philosophy that I find boring to read and sometimes even think is pure absurdity.

I am talking the dreaded Jacques Derrida and things that he likes to talk about such as presence and absence. Shivers. Well these dreaded things are more important to things like film studies than the origin of language for with film you can create realities that are so visual and hyper-real but they may have different rules than our traditional reality / our traditional understanding of reality. Now this also applies to language but it is so easy to slip someone into an external reality via film while doing so with language often takes more time.

What I am saying here is just accept it is very important how you tell a story and do not listen to the formalists or the deconstructionists explain why it is important, for it quickly turns into that teacher sound from Peanuts / Snoopy.

Links a Peanut video and makes it a tinyurl for our smiley's mess it up. https://tinyurl.com/ycwzq2jk

This message last edited by Roland00 on 16/12/2018 at 04:07:10 AM
Reply to message
Is there an uncanny valley of sci-fi hardness? - 14/12/2018 03:17:46 PM 380 Views
the trailers look stupid - 14/12/2018 05:01:30 PM 241 Views
The premise is the only thing that made me want to see it - 15/12/2018 04:09:16 PM 236 Views
Yes, and for your mental health you should probably skip the rest of the answer. - 16/12/2018 04:06:29 AM 226 Views
I just look at them as fantasy with a technology theme - 17/12/2018 01:04:12 PM 237 Views
I can't - 17/12/2018 02:34:17 PM 211 Views
or just use nuclear power - 17/12/2018 10:20:43 PM 226 Views
There are ways you could make sense of the Matrix if you try. (Doing so is of course absurd.) - 18/12/2018 01:26:56 AM 224 Views
My final sentence allows for that - 18/12/2018 02:21:19 PM 220 Views
Looks like the moviegoing public agrees - 18/12/2018 03:11:28 AM 237 Views

Reply to Message