Active Users:320 Time:29/04/2024 02:05:37 PM
I can't aerocontrols Send a noteboard - 17/12/2018 02:34:17 PM

View original post
Then I judge them like fantasy not science fiction. Sort of like comic book movies and Star Wars movies. You have to have some actual science to call it science fiction. The one who use bad science bother me more than the ones who use not science at all. Matrix is a great example of one that uses very bad science, the idea that you could use human as batteries is not only stupid it is lazy.

...and the Matrix is a good example. I could theoretically accept as a fantasy premise that humans could be used as batteries, even though I know the idea is scientifically bunk, but I can't accept that AND ignore the fact that if the AIs could use organic creatures as batteries, they would have a lot less trouble using cattle or lobotomized humans as batteries. Or just simulate a 'Matrix' set in the year 1600 so your human subjects have no way to escape or cause trouble.

Hollywood has the best moral compass, because it has compassion.
Reply to message
Is there an uncanny valley of sci-fi hardness? - 14/12/2018 03:17:46 PM 380 Views
the trailers look stupid - 14/12/2018 05:01:30 PM 240 Views
The premise is the only thing that made me want to see it - 15/12/2018 04:09:16 PM 236 Views
I just look at them as fantasy with a technology theme - 17/12/2018 01:04:12 PM 237 Views
I can't - 17/12/2018 02:34:17 PM 211 Views
or just use nuclear power - 17/12/2018 10:20:43 PM 226 Views
There are ways you could make sense of the Matrix if you try. (Doing so is of course absurd.) - 18/12/2018 01:26:56 AM 224 Views
My final sentence allows for that - 18/12/2018 02:21:19 PM 220 Views
Looks like the moviegoing public agrees - 18/12/2018 03:11:28 AM 237 Views

Reply to Message