This wasn't QAnoN decrying the virus as a hoax and/or a conspiracy. It was accredited epidemiologists asking all to consider, at what point is the cure worse than the disease?
A worthwhile discussion even if the answer is, not yet.
With the manifesto being crafted at a location "in more common language would be called an extreme libertarian* and anti-communist think tank which thinks any government spending sends us onto the road to communism."
https://www.aier.org/pertinent_tags/socialism/
Literally they think socialism is the same as authoritarianism and totalitarianism.
(note Austrians Econ people are not the same as Libertarians, but in "common" American vernacular this is the closest synonym.)
So yeah not QAnon, just other types of nonsense. Now the doctors are separate from the organization so lets pivot to that.
21% of the people who have died of COVID are 64 and under by the CDC official numbers. Furthermore you can have permanent disabilities caused by COVID even if you survive, who is going to make up for that lost income when you become disabled due to the disease. We need at least 8x the amount of people to get infected to develop herd immunity.
Who is going to pay for this?
As long as there is a chance of death and maiming the economy is not going to recover even if the lockdowns are lifted.
We have this "information", this empiricism, via statistical methods comparing different countries recovery and when consumer spending bounces back.