Active Users:229 Time:20/04/2024 10:06:22 AM
Here's a simple economic fact fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 11/11/2021 04:54:14 PM

You're not going to get hundreds of millions of dollars to do WoT on screen if one of the core aspects of the world is that your gender is tied to your soul and immutable. Call that wokeism, or call it media companies doing what they always do: play to the masses to maximize profit, but that's the basic fact.

Now, whether the only way to deal with that aspect of WoT is to change it, or if there's another way to handle it is a different question. I don't think the latter is impossible, but it'd still require a fair bit of tweaking.

As is whether the ripple effects Judkins mentions are actually thought through by the writers, and makes for an internally consistent story on screen. We won't know that till several seasons (if the show even gets that far), because this does ripple all through the series, in some ways.

But I'm not shocked this was changed. They telegraphed this long ago. In an early Twitter AMA, Judkins replied to someone who asked about the gender essentialism in WoT, and said that some of those aspects would be changed, and it appears they've done just that.

Hoping RJ would do the same is all spin, of course. There's literally no way for anyone to know. If he were alive, though, I wouldn't exactly be shocked if he went along with it, but I'm sure others think differently on this.

Reply to message
This Rafe Judkins interview reduces my confidence that the TV series will be good - 11/11/2021 03:55:20 PM 431 Views
Here's a simple economic fact - 11/11/2021 04:54:14 PM 139 Views
You're right, it's all about the money and projecting whether RJ would approve is spin. - 11/11/2021 05:44:56 PM 145 Views
I'm fairly certain RJ would have approved of making money, though! *NM* - 11/11/2021 07:31:08 PM 62 Views
I am curious how large his estate was - 11/11/2021 07:41:20 PM 185 Views
? - 11/11/2021 08:31:07 PM 132 Views
Curiosity rarely singes the Roland Bacon - 11/11/2021 09:07:42 PM 164 Views
I wish they had just gotten rid of Perrin altogether. - 11/11/2021 09:09:57 PM 125 Views
Bah, Perrin is closeted bisexual representation *NM* - 11/11/2021 09:25:57 PM 82 Views
Sigh just learned of the leaks and they are making Perrin even more hetero and angsty *NM* - 12/11/2021 01:17:42 AM 78 Views
Yea . . . spoilers inside - 12/11/2021 03:35:44 PM 123 Views
Surely yes. - 12/11/2021 04:32:24 PM 109 Views
Who knows? - 12/11/2021 04:54:02 PM 107 Views
More hetero than 'all the way' hetero? *NM* - 13/11/2021 03:11:55 AM 52 Views
Many of the storylines around Perrin became tedious but would be less so with editing. - 11/11/2021 10:15:33 PM 172 Views
Wrong spot *NM* - 12/11/2021 01:23:58 AM 56 Views
They could have Mat save him. - 12/11/2021 03:37:51 PM 119 Views
I never even read Shannara - 13/11/2021 03:13:35 AM 105 Views
Not going to argue this here - 11/11/2021 06:22:48 PM 140 Views
Really, not 'Watch and find out'? *NM* - 11/11/2021 07:08:13 PM 57 Views
I used that at the other place - 11/11/2021 07:17:05 PM 125 Views
It's a pretty big change, yeah, but also a logical one. - 11/11/2021 07:33:20 PM 114 Views
Yes, this had me worried as I was rereading the series - 14/11/2021 10:02:48 AM 109 Views
The "pro-trans" crowd? - 14/11/2021 01:59:11 PM 113 Views
What several ways ? - 14/11/2021 09:04:33 PM 113 Views
Here's an easy one - 14/11/2021 11:02:31 PM 111 Views
The 2nd option isn't bad - 15/11/2021 09:07:07 AM 93 Views

Reply to Message