Active Users:408 Time:27/04/2024 03:06:00 AM
Re: This Rafe Judkins interview reduces my confidence that the TV series will be good Cannoli Send a noteboard - 12/11/2021 01:24:47 AM

" In Emond’s Field, for example, there are people who come from all these different countries. So that’s the way we portrayed our world."

No, there are not people who come from all these different countries. It is a canonical fact that Emond's Field and the other two main Two Rivers villages are a homogenous, isolated breeding pool, with noticeable differences from even the peripheral village, Taren Ferry. The population of the Two Rivers has traits that have all but been bred out of the rest of the continent's and they retain characteristics from two thousand years ago. Later in the story, they have people from other countries come in, so having Emond's Field be a polyglot melting pot really undermines the impact of that migration.

And he makes this assertion seemingly to justify something that does not need to be justified, namely the race of the actors!

Also, the SERIES is not gender essentialist. It is a story about a society that INCORRECTLY subscribes to gender essentialism to a great degree, because the binary aspect of the One Power influences their thinking. Robert Jordan directly attributed the lack of religion in WoT to the presence of the One Power, which is pretty dumb and not remotely reflective of actual religious mentalities, but it does show that in his mind, the One Power has significant effects on people perceive their world. If WoT was gender essentialist, the narrative would justify the "men are this, women are that" assertions or beliefs of the characters. But it does not. We see violent women, nurturing men, women who are good at abstract reasoning and rational thought, who lead armies and run businesses and men who ride their emotions. The series constantly has people running into things that challenge their worldview or occurrences believed impossible to a degree that any reader who believes a fact is true in the story solely on the basis of a character's statement of it is too stupid to be taken seriously.

Also, if you can have gender issues in a world every normal person has a binary option for chromosomes, you can do it with saidar & saidin. With so much material that they have to mention how impossible it is to put everything on the screen, there is also no need to divert from the story for "BTW here is a totally original character who is biologically female but channels saidin and here is a woman with an adam's apple who ALSO channels saidin" and all the rest of that nonsense no one knew they cared about ten years ago.

"One of the core themes of this book series is balance, and that’s very unusual for a big fantasy book series. "

I would appreciate you running the numbers on that please. Show me how all the other big fantasy series out there are not about balance. What does that even mean?

"It’s a fantasy series much more underpinned by Eastern religion and Eastern philosophy than by a Judeo-Christian model."

Yes, with the stigmata-bearing sacrificial savior believed to be born of a virgin, ethnically a descendant of 12 tribes condemned to wander in a desert for their sins, whom they believe is going to be born to lead them to glory but he's actually here for the whole human race. Nothing Judeo-Christian to see here, keep moving. What I am fairly certain of is that Robert Jordan knew a lot more about Eastern religion and Eastern philosophy than a lot of the people who claim an interest in that aspect of the series.




Honestly, the best I think we can hope for is a good adaptation of the more superficial thrills that makes the series so appealing to my 15/16 year old self, or the Jason-Denzelish sort of people who think Brandon Sanderson nailed it.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
This Rafe Judkins interview reduces my confidence that the TV series will be good - 11/11/2021 03:55:20 PM 435 Views
Here's a simple economic fact - 11/11/2021 04:54:14 PM 142 Views
You're right, it's all about the money and projecting whether RJ would approve is spin. - 11/11/2021 05:44:56 PM 150 Views
I'm fairly certain RJ would have approved of making money, though! *NM* - 11/11/2021 07:31:08 PM 64 Views
I am curious how large his estate was - 11/11/2021 07:41:20 PM 188 Views
? - 11/11/2021 08:31:07 PM 136 Views
Curiosity rarely singes the Roland Bacon - 11/11/2021 09:07:42 PM 169 Views
I wish they had just gotten rid of Perrin altogether. - 11/11/2021 09:09:57 PM 130 Views
Bah, Perrin is closeted bisexual representation *NM* - 11/11/2021 09:25:57 PM 87 Views
Sigh just learned of the leaks and they are making Perrin even more hetero and angsty *NM* - 12/11/2021 01:17:42 AM 79 Views
Yea . . . spoilers inside - 12/11/2021 03:35:44 PM 128 Views
Surely yes. - 12/11/2021 04:32:24 PM 113 Views
Who knows? - 12/11/2021 04:54:02 PM 113 Views
More hetero than 'all the way' hetero? *NM* - 13/11/2021 03:11:55 AM 53 Views
Many of the storylines around Perrin became tedious but would be less so with editing. - 11/11/2021 10:15:33 PM 177 Views
Wrong spot *NM* - 12/11/2021 01:23:58 AM 59 Views
They could have Mat save him. - 12/11/2021 03:37:51 PM 125 Views
I never even read Shannara - 13/11/2021 03:13:35 AM 109 Views
Not going to argue this here - 11/11/2021 06:22:48 PM 145 Views
Really, not 'Watch and find out'? *NM* - 11/11/2021 07:08:13 PM 59 Views
I used that at the other place - 11/11/2021 07:17:05 PM 131 Views
It's a pretty big change, yeah, but also a logical one. - 11/11/2021 07:33:20 PM 118 Views
Re: This Rafe Judkins interview reduces my confidence that the TV series will be good - 12/11/2021 01:24:47 AM 151 Views
Yes, this had me worried as I was rereading the series - 14/11/2021 10:02:48 AM 115 Views
The "pro-trans" crowd? - 14/11/2021 01:59:11 PM 117 Views
What several ways ? - 14/11/2021 09:04:33 PM 116 Views
Here's an easy one - 14/11/2021 11:02:31 PM 116 Views
The 2nd option isn't bad - 15/11/2021 09:07:07 AM 96 Views

Reply to Message