Active Users:521 Time:08/11/2026 11:11:28 AM
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM

View original post
In 2022, all news articles are opinion pieces, regardless of the source.

Walter Cronkite was an opinion journalist. He chose what to report on, and what not to report on. And any number of issues and injustices were ignored by him, not even out of malice or indifference, necessarily. Just lack of awareness, which every human suffers from, is enough to make the idea of "objective" news nonsensical.

News is, and always will be, a two way street. Yes, the journalist must use the utmost caution to be factual and at least acknowledge other perspectives, if only to poke holes in them. But the news consumer must also do their due diligence. Believe no one person fully, diversify your sources, and spend the time to get as full a picture as possible

Refusing to spend that time and simply blaming the media is a chickenish way to absolve oneself of responsibility.

Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 1086 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 804 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 422 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 767 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 758 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 858 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 737 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 730 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 745 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 762 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 419 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 763 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 778 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 747 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 404 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 787 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 422 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 765 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 748 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 698 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 740 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 723 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 997 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 743 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 411 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 772 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 705 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 757 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 725 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 718 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 791 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 774 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 708 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 759 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 723 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 734 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 908 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 706 Views

Reply to Message