Active Users:521 Time:08/11/2026 11:11:30 AM
I dunno fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM

View original post

By "debate whether," I was implying argument could be made either way.


Not really. You judge a Constitution by how it does in the face of changes to society, technology and economics. And yours has failed. It's not a particularly surprising result, either. It was a good first iteration. Build on it.
As to the rest, it might very well happen. Most younger voters certainly don't revere American history nor its Founding Fathers. Once they are the majority, who knows what will change? Any and all gods willing, it will happen after I'm gone. If I somehow manage to hang around another 20+ years, I can sit and rock on my front porch while waving my cane angrily at these dastardly voters.


To the contrary, the younger voters honor the Founders and the Constitution the most by asking better of it. Cynically giving up and settling for "small government" whatever that means is the thing that's dastardly.
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 1086 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 805 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 422 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 767 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 758 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 858 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 737 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 730 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 745 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 762 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 419 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 763 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 778 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 748 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 404 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 787 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 422 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 765 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 748 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 699 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 740 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 724 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 997 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 743 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 411 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 772 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 705 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 757 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 725 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 718 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 792 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 774 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 709 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 759 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 723 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 734 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 909 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 706 Views

Reply to Message