Active Users:239 Time:08/05/2024 08:16:02 PM
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well Isaac Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM
Although I tend to agree, I must say that increasing the size of the known universe does not necessarily demand an increase in the total number of protons. The universe is, after all, primarily composed of empty space. Besides, it is still possible that objects and phenomena at the extreme ranges of our perception may actually be comprised of anti-protons instead.


Not exactly, when we reference 'expanding universe' we actually mean two different types of expansion. The Observable Universe os actually just a normal sphere some 90 billion light years across centered on Earth, this is expanding, Hubble and all, but we can only see as far as time allows... this would tend to make people think a sphere around Earth some 13.7 billion light years in radius but it's bigger than that since the observable radius is the distance that light could cover in that time, the objects moving away from each other and all. Common misconception, yes, the Universe, observable and otherwise is expanding, but totally seperate from that, the distance we can see is expanding, so a galaxy currently right outside the observable universe would eventually become visible too. It is possible there is nothing beyond the visible but this requires an violation of the Copernican Principle so that the Earth really is the center of the Universe in 3-space, obviously fairly unlikely, but more over, recent models put the actual Universe's size, in relation to the Observable Universe, at many times large, as much as 10^23 times larger.

I also feel obliged to point out that 136x2^256 might be better utilized for play purposes as a constant, which I shall name "COIN" where 1 coin is equal to approximately 0.001x136x2^256, and thus for game play purposes we would have 1000 of these "COINs" :P

That would work too, except that the whole point was to mix things up a little. :P


Truem but if you start working with anything more than 5-10 digits the ones after that are basically meaningless, people will just bet in scientific notation, and I'd guess the significant digits won't exceed telephone number length, like all 1.234567x10^big and such, might as well shave off the x10^big, I'm in regardless but in terms of boat rocking you'd almost be better off placing bids in hexidecimal or using low millions or something, IMHO

I think it will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this will have on the betting.


Probably a painfully large spreadsheet on your behalf and confusion over used notation, I'd advise letting people use E# calculator style for base ten, like a 5,000,000= 5E6 or 6,789,000,000 equal 6.789E9 and such

But yeah, I'm in

Welcome :)
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Coin Game V - 30/11/2010 11:45:31 PM 2282 Views
I'm a little confused(as usual) - 30/11/2010 11:50:06 PM 1083 Views
It's the same basic system as before. You'll just have a few more coins to play with. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:25:39 AM 617 Views
Oh ok cool stuff. *NM* - 02/12/2010 12:28:43 AM 628 Views
I object to your outdated usage of proton count - 01/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1091 Views
I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well - 01/12/2010 01:41:14 AM 1195 Views
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM 1299 Views
People are free to submit their entries in any format they desire - 01/12/2010 02:40:21 AM 1159 Views
Hoo boy, this is going to be fun. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:59:30 AM 625 Views
whole real numbers only? *NM* - 01/12/2010 03:41:19 AM 656 Views
Ah, thanks, that does need some clarification - 01/12/2010 04:08:33 AM 988 Views
So if I bet negative, assuming I'm not the lowest, do I earn coins? - 01/12/2010 04:23:11 AM 1063 Views
Thanks for pointing out the necessity for another rule! - 01/12/2010 04:34:43 AM 1152 Views
*NM* - 01/12/2010 04:37:16 AM 651 Views
Ooh, interesting... I'm in *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:25:44 AM 715 Views
Yes, I shall play - 01/12/2010 01:30:11 AM 1034 Views
I'm in. This will definitely be interesting. - 01/12/2010 01:38:04 AM 1032 Views
Yes'm *NM* - 01/12/2010 03:27:26 AM 725 Views
I am totally in for this. - 01/12/2010 03:37:43 AM 1059 Views
I'll do it. This could be fun. *NM* - 01/12/2010 06:15:48 AM 664 Views
I think I need to join this game. - 01/12/2010 06:44:18 AM 952 Views
Let's begin Round 1! - 02/12/2010 01:19:33 PM 1093 Views
Round 2! - 04/12/2010 05:30:41 PM 1172 Views
lol *NM* - 04/12/2010 05:58:16 PM 803 Views
Ha ha, awesome - 04/12/2010 07:28:30 PM 1041 Views
I had no idea what I was doing and I won!! AHAHAHAHhehehehehe.... *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:44:35 PM 726 Views
- 04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM 1028 Views
Against a force such as this, there can be no victory. *NM* - 05/12/2010 06:30:15 AM 640 Views
*NM* - 05/12/2010 07:09:41 AM 666 Views
Of course not... - 05/12/2010 07:22:41 AM 1201 Views
We must join with him. It would be wise, my friend. *NM* - 05/12/2010 07:38:53 AM 691 Views
Tell me, friend, when did you abandon reason for madness?? *NM* - 05/12/2010 02:45:35 PM 652 Views
Who me? Or are you asking BA?? *NM* - 07/12/2010 02:22:51 AM 622 Views
*NM* - 07/12/2010 03:11:19 AM 633 Views
*NM* - 07/12/2010 10:11:12 PM 644 Views
It's a scene from Lord of the Rings! - 07/12/2010 03:06:28 PM 1032 Views
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way of pain. *NM* - 07/12/2010 02:59:35 AM 653 Views
Nooooo! - 07/12/2010 03:35:21 AM 1070 Views
Yes, I did not expect you to show wisdom, even on your own behalf; - 07/12/2010 06:48:17 PM 872 Views
I am ashamed to admit I cannot produce the appropriate response to this. - 07/12/2010 08:05:27 PM 1038 Views
That's fine. - 08/12/2010 03:26:23 AM 1003 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2010 04:00:20 AM 621 Views
So, a serious question about my nerd-cred. - 08/12/2010 06:00:05 AM 1055 Views
MORE of a nerd. - 08/12/2010 01:50:47 PM 1065 Views
MUCH more. HILARIOUSLY more. - 08/12/2010 03:35:47 PM 1220 Views
Round 3! - 06/12/2010 07:48:56 PM 1106 Views
Dangit! I had my bid planned, but forgot to submit it. *NM* - 06/12/2010 07:54:15 PM 686 Views
Kronin's bid was gibberish and higher too - 06/12/2010 09:13:08 PM 1165 Views
I of course meant them all in their most popular incarnations. *NM* - 07/12/2010 04:44:02 AM 674 Views
Actually, they combine fairly easily. - 08/12/2010 01:22:08 PM 983 Views
This is absurd. *NM* - 06/12/2010 09:59:55 PM 627 Views
This post does not belong here. *NM* - 08/12/2010 10:17:37 PM 592 Views
Round 4! - 09/12/2010 02:12:20 AM 1226 Views
Yes, I am lucking out majorly! - 09/12/2010 02:42:34 AM 993 Views
Round 5! - 10/12/2010 03:34:00 PM 1160 Views
Round 6! - 12/12/2010 08:14:21 PM 1046 Views
Wow, completely forgot *NM* - 13/12/2010 10:45:45 AM 686 Views
Round 7! - 15/12/2010 05:13:52 AM 1081 Views
Way to be a jerk, Gher. *NM* - 15/12/2010 05:19:15 AM 614 Views
I thought it was easy enough to work with. A jerk would put down a equation... - 15/12/2010 04:10:52 PM 887 Views
I don't mind either way. - 16/12/2010 04:03:43 AM 1312 Views
Shoot I totally forgot about this game... *NM* - 15/12/2010 09:47:55 PM 608 Views
The End - 18/12/2010 07:07:18 PM 1140 Views
I knew this was going to happen *NM* - 18/12/2010 07:46:58 PM 562 Views
I was expecting second place again, the win's nice *NM* - 18/12/2010 07:52:40 PM 598 Views
Oh, that's right, so did I. - 19/12/2010 06:42:10 AM 938 Views
Heh heh heh - 19/12/2010 03:30:03 PM 996 Views
Re: Heh heh heh - 19/12/2010 10:34:49 PM 1072 Views
D'oh! - 19/12/2010 05:19:32 AM 937 Views

Reply to Message