People who recognise each other are likely masons or scum. Masons are unlikely to speak up, and scum are expected to lie, and I've sadly experienced enough masons covering for scummy behaviour that I'm going to forestall any inclination they might have to either affirm or deny (and lie) this matter by stating that most of us probably don't recognise each other.

And I'm still for lynching someone.

So let's play a game. I ask a question, like:

"If you had to lynch someone, who would it be, and why?"

And the person I have pointed out has to answer.

And yes, I know there's nothing to go on, so we can skip the "I don't know"s and other such evasive manoeuvres and go directly for actual answers. Because evasions just waste time and make me want to lynch you.

Now, someone may ask "wait, Fanatic-Templar, why do you get to choose who gets questioned instead of being a target like everybody else?"

I'm glad you asked! And the answer is simply that I've already voted for someone and explained why, so I have, in fact, already answered my question and could be considered its first target. As a matter of fact, why don't we make the target of the question the next asker?

So here's the question: ranagrande, if you had to lynch someone, who would it be, and why?