Mostly because he said he might be a bit RBIRL, and he's usually a fun player to play with (posts a bunch, moves the game along, etc)
It's kind of annoying- I'm almost loath to kill off anyone who posts often, just because I get so antsy when the game slows down. Yet it's almost a given that at least one or two of the "posts-often" category will be a DF. Oh well...
It's kind of annoying- I'm almost loath to kill off anyone who posts often, just because I get so antsy when the game slows down. Yet it's almost a given that at least one or two of the "posts-often" category will be a DF. Oh well...
I'm guessing you're removing Fox for exactly the reason you said, DF or not, but this is exactly how I'd do it. Let's say right now you, me, and Hopper were the DF team. I'd say I feel kinda bad about killing both of you last game, as essentialy random sacrifices, and that while you might be guilty, we shouldn't include you on the random list, to give you a chance to play this game, DF or town. Bam, now you're both off the list. The town gets to pick randomly off a list composed of all townies. If it's not real solid, or real random (like picking a MVP or the newest player etc as 'ref' to get 10) then they need to stay on. And actually, if the newest player were a buddy DF, that would also be a great way to get them knocked off the list. "If we're going to randomly off people, and we need to deselect one more to avoid overcomplicating random selection, let's leave the newb off, give them a chance to play" Taking DK, me, and Hobo off is safe enough, since we can use the very reasons I suggested our removal as our defense, which will work and will just make whoever else gets picked have any even slimmer chance of surviving. On things like this, you have to minimize the room for the DFs to maneuver, because they are in a better position to do so and odds favor they will manage to stack the deck somehow.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Rafo Mafia 4: Day 1 has ended.
- 27/01/2010 05:53:50 PM
3739 Views
This is a confirmation of the prompt receival of said role message.
- 27/01/2010 08:30:45 PM
1732 Views
You made it up
- 27/01/2010 09:01:31 PM
1676 Views
Hmm ...
- 27/01/2010 09:21:59 PM
1802 Views
Ha.
- 28/01/2010 01:28:27 AM
1597 Views
It sounds like a real word.
- 28/01/2010 01:55:58 AM
1689 Views
You know, I'm still irritated we haven't been able to come up with a good R1 system
- 28/01/2010 07:08:22 AM
1662 Views
Well, lacking anything else...
- 28/01/2010 11:58:25 PM
1801 Views
I haven't the faintest idea what they mean.
- 29/01/2010 01:30:19 AM
1730 Views
Not really
- 29/01/2010 02:27:05 AM
1741 Views
Let's try something
- 29/01/2010 02:47:30 AM
1679 Views
alrighty then
- 29/01/2010 03:29:51 AM
1712 Views
That's sufficient, thanks
- 29/01/2010 03:48:11 AM
1575 Views
Yea, my message has all that.
- 29/01/2010 03:56:52 AM
1740 Views
Probably
- 29/01/2010 04:10:42 AM
1642 Views
Re: Probably
- 29/01/2010 07:30:48 AM
1598 Views
True- most DFs would wait a bit, and be like the 4th or 5th to jump in
- 29/01/2010 08:19:43 AM
1684 Views
I've got MPD
- 29/01/2010 04:22:00 AM
1681 Views
Surprise, surprise: I do too.
- 29/01/2010 06:21:04 AM
1676 Views
Remember when we killed the Serial Killer on Day 1? That was fun. Let's do that! *NM*
- 29/01/2010 08:20:24 AM
953 Views
I have MPD and number under 14. *NM*
- 29/01/2010 06:18:59 AM
1038 Views
I like to think of the first kill as a sacrifice to the Gods of Mafia
- 30/01/2010 04:14:17 AM
1755 Views
Re: I like to think of the first kill as a sacrifice to the Gods of Mafia
- 30/01/2010 04:27:53 AM
1670 Views
High priests cannot be sacrificed!
- 30/01/2010 04:53:38 PM
1579 Views
Some cultures, they make the best sacrifices
- 30/01/2010 05:47:46 PM
1675 Views
- 30/01/2010 05:47:46 PM
1675 Views
Hm... let's rule out F&R, too
- 30/01/2010 06:46:27 PM
1719 Views
This is sort of what I mean
- 30/01/2010 08:02:17 PM
1597 Views
I want to roleclaim.
- 30/01/2010 07:08:11 PM
1694 Views
That is, well, surprising
- 30/01/2010 08:28:04 PM
1728 Views
Yeah, but I think it's best to do it now.
- 30/01/2010 09:38:49 PM
1588 Views
Hm. I wonder if we're all robots inside of a Mafia simulator. *NM*
- 30/01/2010 11:20:25 PM
892 Views
Well, I'm back...
- 31/01/2010 01:43:17 AM
1650 Views
Why do fencers keep appearing without me knowing of it?!?
- 31/01/2010 02:48:22 AM
1678 Views
Oh, and I had my first real tournament today...
- 31/01/2010 03:23:45 AM
1687 Views
Eh. Just don't listen to Issac too much.
- 31/01/2010 04:47:53 AM
1646 Views
I wanna say F-T, just cause I hate Millers.
- 31/01/2010 05:10:07 AM
1576 Views
But do you think a DF would try something that DFs already did in the game we just played?
- 31/01/2010 05:53:24 AM
1655 Views
And on a third hand...
- 31/01/2010 07:00:22 AM
1725 Views
So... back to neutral. *NM*
- 31/01/2010 03:27:58 PM
860 Views
You don't find that statement dubious?
- 31/01/2010 04:14:47 PM
1646 Views
I knew Yunalseca was a Darkfriend...
- 31/01/2010 07:17:33 PM
1610 Views
Everyone! Deep breaths...
- 31/01/2010 11:50:39 PM
1627 Views
That's a pretty big thing to forget though.
- 01/02/2010 01:39:44 AM
1609 Views
Who said anything about forgetting?
- 01/02/2010 02:53:49 AM
1656 Views
It brings you protection from guilty Cop results. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 03:01:22 AM
1024 Views
No...
- 01/02/2010 06:25:07 AM
1659 Views
Man... I hate defending people I'm not sure about
- 01/02/2010 07:14:13 AM
1668 Views
I agree with beet here.
- 01/02/2010 07:42:12 AM
1618 Views
Offer alternatives then
- 01/02/2010 11:18:47 AM
1663 Views
I didn't mean we shouldn't reference strategies from earlier games
- 01/02/2010 02:23:26 PM
1649 Views
I agree, more or less
- 31/01/2010 05:55:11 AM
1676 Views
Re: I agree, more or less
- 31/01/2010 03:34:10 PM
1689 Views
Tracker is a role that sees who his target performs a Night Action on...
- 31/01/2010 03:49:24 PM
1552 Views
Re: I agree, more or less
- 31/01/2010 04:19:33 PM
1627 Views
Eh. I think this is going to end like Hopper.
- 31/01/2010 11:58:52 PM
1635 Views
What I don't like is the fact that Millers are often not told they're Millers.
- 01/02/2010 12:08:14 AM
1645 Views
Well, he could still be Mafia and have appropriate flavor.
- 01/02/2010 01:46:58 AM
1654 Views
We can't just lynch Isaac on the off chance that he might be a DF.
- 31/01/2010 05:42:08 AM
1658 Views
Alright, from my reading,
- 31/01/2010 10:53:52 PM
1643 Views
RE: I didn't mean we shouldn't reference strategies from earlier games (horizontal scroll avoidance)
- 01/02/2010 02:46:35 PM
1749 Views
I really just meant that I don't think F-T's claim of not knowing about Yuna's claim is
- 01/02/2010 06:16:11 PM
1637 Views
You still haven't explained what the purpose of such a lie would be.
- 01/02/2010 07:15:35 PM
1603 Views
I think the rationale was this:
- 01/02/2010 07:38:41 PM
1551 Views
Beg Pardon?
- 01/02/2010 08:07:20 PM
1624 Views
It's true, Isaac likes to be a leader, rather than a doer. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 11:17:02 PM
931 Views
Coward. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 11:17:21 PM
959 Views
Er... what just happened, here? *NM*
- 02/02/2010 12:55:51 AM
987 Views
I made a pointless post, decided to turn it into a semi-sarcastic insult.
- 02/02/2010 01:27:48 AM
1631 Views
There's not really anything to explain
- 01/02/2010 09:20:57 PM
1671 Views
Re: There's not really anything to explain
- 01/02/2010 10:03:57 PM
1655 Views
Re: There's not really anything to explain
- 01/02/2010 10:33:49 PM
1708 Views
Re: There's not really anything to explain
- 01/02/2010 11:11:37 PM
1679 Views
Maybe you should ask one of the others to explain this to me
- 02/02/2010 12:01:48 AM
1597 Views
Re: Maybe you should ask one of the others to explain this to me
- 02/02/2010 01:15:41 AM
1670 Views
Right, so: A New Target
- 01/02/2010 08:03:28 PM
1788 Views
Re: Right, so: A New Target
- 01/02/2010 08:20:06 PM
1551 Views
Re: Right, so: A New Target *NM*
- 01/02/2010 08:48:25 PM
868 Views
Message get eaten? *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:21:34 PM
908 Views
Apparantly... It was just a minor thing, lemme see if I remember...
- 02/02/2010 12:44:28 AM
1653 Views
Right, so: Defending Myself
- 01/02/2010 11:30:38 PM
1744 Views
Hmm...more accusations beyond beet's
- 02/02/2010 06:02:51 AM
1598 Views
Fair question, but it's actually pretty straightforward.
- 02/02/2010 04:41:18 PM
1771 Views
Your logic isn't terrible...
- 02/02/2010 04:54:54 PM
1563 Views
Re: Your logic isn't terrible...
- 02/02/2010 05:42:43 PM
1634 Views
Re: The random thing
- 02/02/2010 04:59:42 PM
1785 Views
Nah, I anticipated this would make me the prime lynch candidate.
- 02/02/2010 08:48:19 PM
1740 Views
Re: Nah, I anticipated this would make me the prime lynch candidate.
- 02/02/2010 09:23:43 PM
1649 Views
Okay, so I've been reading, but I kept meaning to post on my comp. Sorry.
- 02/02/2010 06:21:12 AM
1697 Views
I never tried to stop any discussion
- 02/02/2010 12:46:54 PM
1679 Views
Like I said, I don't find it very suspicious, but it was just something I had seen.
- 02/02/2010 11:14:53 PM
1676 Views
Kronin is at least as suspicious as Issac, or F-T
- 02/02/2010 05:09:56 PM
1657 Views
That's pretty bold claim of intention.
- 02/02/2010 05:18:40 PM
1665 Views
Vote: Fanatic-Templar
- 03/02/2010 04:36:52 AM
1721 Views
Re: Vote: Fanatic-Templar
- 03/02/2010 03:13:57 PM
1752 Views
Speaking of time...
- 03/02/2010 03:28:42 PM
1713 Views
Only if it starts to grind to a halt. *NM*
- 03/02/2010 04:50:32 PM
979 Views
Re: Only if it starts to grind to a halt.
- 03/02/2010 06:52:54 PM
1725 Views
Er... IS it active? I feel like we've kinda exhausted everything
- 03/02/2010 11:19:29 PM
1587 Views
Hahaha. well, it was!
- 04/02/2010 12:59:13 AM
1585 Views
"No lynch" is a bad idea. At the very least, let's lynch someone random *NM*
- 04/02/2010 04:07:00 AM
939 Views
Everybody knows my perspective on no lynches...or at least I suspect they do. *NM*
- 04/02/2010 04:09:17 AM
974 Views
So you'd rather lynch someone random over F-T? Why?
- 04/02/2010 04:35:40 AM
1696 Views
Because I think F-T is almost definitely not a DF
- 04/02/2010 06:58:15 AM
1672 Views
Re: Because I think F-T is almost definitely not a DF
- 04/02/2010 07:07:37 AM
1540 Views
Well, yeah- a chance of getting a DF is better than no chance at all
- 04/02/2010 07:04:27 PM
1619 Views
But there is a chance F-T is a DF.
- 04/02/2010 07:34:37 PM
1617 Views
Fair enough...
- 04/02/2010 07:49:26 PM
1604 Views
I agree with D_K actually
- 04/02/2010 08:32:09 PM
1710 Views
You think F-T has less than a 29% (4/14) chance to be a DF?
- 04/02/2010 08:55:34 PM
1553 Views
If a given random person is 30%, then yes, I think F-T is 29% or less
- 04/02/2010 11:20:26 PM
1650 Views
I regret that I have only one life to give to the Light...
- 04/02/2010 11:00:56 PM
1659 Views
- 05/02/2010 12:20:04 AM
1680 Views
You know, you're still at L-3.
- 04/02/2010 11:14:40 PM
1844 Views
L-2, as it were.
- 04/02/2010 11:41:10 PM
1609 Views
Just had to make me incorrect?
- 04/02/2010 11:55:02 PM
1573 Views
I couldn't resist.
*NM*
- 05/02/2010 01:07:59 AM
923 Views
- 05/02/2010 01:15:51 AM
1691 Views
*NM*
- 05/02/2010 01:07:59 AM
923 Views
- 05/02/2010 01:15:51 AM
1691 Views
Yeah, but I wasn't sure if I'd still be alive next time I came around
.
- 05/02/2010 03:12:19 AM
1610 Views
.
- 05/02/2010 03:12:19 AM
1610 Views
- 05/02/2010 12:20:04 AM
1680 Views
I don't anyone will target you with a night action tonight, frankly.
- 05/02/2010 03:14:26 AM
1646 Views

*NM*