Bergoiyn already had an ironclad claim though.
Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 16/03/2010 03:59:44 AM
If you're a DF, and you suspect Bergioyn, why also suspect ranagrande?
See, those are good points on ranagrande, they don't sound off-the-cuff, which means you actually suspect him, but do so even though it's obvious you think Bergioyn is a killer. Now if Bergioyn isn't on your team, and he's obviously Tank faction, why suspect ranagrande of anything? We don't have two SKs, wouldn't you take as a given that Bergioyn was the SK, what with claiming a killing role? Making ranagrande innocent.
But that doesn't do it, no, because Bergioyn was clearly expecting a vig claim, he has an ally, he can not be an arsonist, he can not be a SK.
See, those are good points on ranagrande, they don't sound off-the-cuff, which means you actually suspect him, but do so even though it's obvious you think Bergioyn is a killer. Now if Bergioyn isn't on your team, and he's obviously Tank faction, why suspect ranagrande of anything? We don't have two SKs, wouldn't you take as a given that Bergioyn was the SK, what with claiming a killing role? Making ranagrande innocent.
But that doesn't do it, no, because Bergioyn was clearly expecting a vig claim, he has an ally, he can not be an arsonist, he can not be a SK.
Everyone was all set to believe him that he was a Mason. Why take the risk of that extra claim? I have difficulty seeing a DF or a SK do that. Bergioyn was expecting a Vig claim, but Beet was expecting a RB claim too, and he turned out to be innocent. I'm starting to feel a bit paranoid because I'm considering the possibility that Gher's rigged this game to purposefully lead us astray with a bunch of roles that don't exist ... back-up RBers and Vigs with no real RBers and Vigs, a Miller with no Cop, maybe even a Firefighter for no Arsonist.
Hopefully this is not the case, but if not then there's something screwy going on. Usually Townies are too honest for their own good ... I have difficulty seeing the RBer in particular lying two Days in a row. And furthermore, if Bergioyn was a member of a Tank and WF was telling the truth about killing Napoleon, then why would Bergioyn claim that he knew for certain that a Vig killed Nap? He would have to know that the other fraction would know that he was lying, outing himself as a DF to them, which would be stupid. Why not just claim that the Vig killed Blaine? But maybe he wanted that? Maybe he was trying to see who would leap on his claim and thus reveal themselves as the other Tank to him but not to the Town? It would be risky and it would be tricky, but it might work. Then the other DF could claim Vig and corroborate his story, and now the two of them know who the other Tank is and have the trust of the Town. But that's a huge and unnecessary risk for someone who already had a great role claim that had been accepted and verified.
But on the other hand, apparently there's no RBer, there's no Cop. I don't know what to think.
Insert theme music here.
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 3 has ended
- 08/03/2010 06:20:26 PM
2013 Views
Okay, so it seems pretty clear that we have a third-party
- 08/03/2010 08:31:17 PM
756 Views
Man, I'm saddled with that job forever, aren't I?
- 08/03/2010 09:58:50 PM
721 Views
Whoops, kinda forgot Hobo died.
- 09/03/2010 01:22:27 AM
868 Views
- 09/03/2010 01:22:27 AM
868 Views
That's just bad manners, tsk tsk, you kill him, then you forget him, eh?
*NM*
- 09/03/2010 01:27:38 AM
429 Views
*NM*
- 09/03/2010 01:27:38 AM
429 Views
What's that now? Kronin killed Hobo?
- 09/03/2010 03:18:54 AM
711 Views
- 09/03/2010 03:18:54 AM
711 Views
Yes, I have incontrovertible proof that Kronin killed Hobo with a Candlestick in the Conservatory
- 09/03/2010 03:34:51 AM
742 Views
- 09/03/2010 03:34:51 AM
742 Views
Let's discuss our new info
- 09/03/2010 01:26:40 AM
811 Views
I don't really see how we're going to be able to come to a quick decision.
- 09/03/2010 06:19:11 AM
920 Views
Vote Record (Table)
- 09/03/2010 05:50:26 AM
878 Views
The Vote Record makes Fox seem very suspicious.
- 09/03/2010 12:20:23 PM
723 Views
I suppose so
- 09/03/2010 06:56:02 PM
770 Views
Good point.
- 09/03/2010 07:32:56 PM
838 Views
Re: Good point.
- 09/03/2010 08:15:32 PM
912 Views
Re: Hobo
- 12/03/2010 04:52:47 AM
845 Views
Pulling a Gher?
- 12/03/2010 05:20:27 AM
653 Views
There were like three times in a row that Gher tried to hammer
- 12/03/2010 01:27:31 PM
723 Views
I'm sorry. RBIRL
- 10/03/2010 07:57:15 AM
901 Views
*Taps on the glass*
- 11/03/2010 11:23:35 PM
874 Views
I'm thinking the same thing... *NM*
- 11/03/2010 11:36:39 PM
403 Views
Well, I was going to wait for our last Hypocop, but...
- 12/03/2010 01:24:32 AM
819 Views
Have I really?
- 12/03/2010 02:53:33 AM
761 Views
EBWOP
- 12/03/2010 02:55:16 AM
756 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 12/03/2010 03:47:04 AM
700 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 12/03/2010 04:04:40 AM
638 Views
Obvious how so? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 04:17:55 AM
498 Views
Well, something like what I did yesterday with the trap.
- 12/03/2010 04:30:47 AM
646 Views
A cop might do something like that.
- 12/03/2010 04:56:42 AM
823 Views
I'm just saying that I think anyone with a role or a bad guy would have been a little more...
- 12/03/2010 05:27:05 AM
701 Views
Re: I'm just saying that I think anyone with a role or a bad guy would have been a little more...
- 12/03/2010 01:23:29 PM
763 Views
Re: I'm just saying that I think anyone with a role or a bad guy would have been a little more...
- 12/03/2010 05:49:05 PM
810 Views
Hrm...
- 12/03/2010 08:05:29 PM
649 Views
Well, a DF working alone would just be a Serial Killer.
- 12/03/2010 08:19:02 PM
849 Views
well of course there are vanillas
- 13/03/2010 12:36:10 AM
720 Views
You all may have noticed...
- 14/03/2010 12:01:11 AM
735 Views
Re: You all may have noticed...
- 14/03/2010 01:49:24 AM
775 Views
On F-T....
- 14/03/2010 03:26:04 AM
661 Views
Re: On F-T....
- 14/03/2010 04:01:09 AM
817 Views
I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 04:07:09 AM
606 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 04:27:54 AM
808 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 01:32:16 PM
833 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 02:24:03 PM
815 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 02:25:20 PM
817 Views
I like Tank-f
- 15/03/2010 08:29:39 PM
634 Views
Eh, tank factions sounds better I think.
- 15/03/2010 08:33:38 PM
658 Views
Re: Eh, tank factions sounds better I think.
- 15/03/2010 08:35:42 PM
707 Views
Back
- 14/03/2010 12:07:58 PM
768 Views
On the subject of inactivity...
- 14/03/2010 01:31:40 PM
809 Views
I use my browser's 'Find' function
- 15/03/2010 03:54:48 PM
945 Views
The site's 'search' function is faster, but a bit limited
- 15/03/2010 05:43:11 PM
702 Views
Eh, for a quick look at how the Day's going, 'Find' works well.
- 15/03/2010 08:18:40 PM
964 Views
Re: Eh, for a quick look at how the Day's going, 'Find' works well.
- 15/03/2010 08:28:07 PM
925 Views
Are we sure we don't want a mass role-claim?
- 14/03/2010 11:55:02 PM
683 Views
Well, it's probably going to come to that before the end of the day
- 15/03/2010 12:29:59 AM
836 Views
So, are you saying I should RC next since fist already did? *NM*
- 15/03/2010 03:05:45 PM
356 Views
Personally I think he jumped the gun.
- 15/03/2010 03:11:35 PM
815 Views
He was a little quick on this one
- 15/03/2010 07:04:53 PM
681 Views
I kind of like this idea.
- 15/03/2010 08:28:05 PM
719 Views
Re: I kind of like this idea.
- 15/03/2010 08:36:09 PM
676 Views
I agree Ranagrande should claim next.
- 15/03/2010 08:45:14 PM
855 Views
Basically, he did jump the gun there but...
- 15/03/2010 05:44:56 PM
759 Views
Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 07:44:45 PM
749 Views
Whoops! Wrong link!
- 15/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
639 Views
I completely believe you.
- 15/03/2010 08:08:04 PM
679 Views
Seems pretty trustworthy to me too.
- 15/03/2010 08:21:30 PM
657 Views
Re: Seems pretty trustworthy to me too.
- 15/03/2010 08:31:08 PM
843 Views
I'd have to agree
- 15/03/2010 08:43:26 PM
737 Views
Re: I'd have to agree
- 15/03/2010 09:21:42 PM
860 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 08:03:11 PM
669 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 09:27:21 PM
674 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 09:48:45 PM
690 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 09:58:37 PM
677 Views
We have a vigilante? God, he must suck.
- 15/03/2010 10:13:33 PM
606 Views
Re: We have a vigilante? God, he must suck.
- 15/03/2010 10:16:58 PM
662 Views
You know?
- 15/03/2010 10:20:10 PM
639 Views
Lol I saw the youtube address and thought you were trying to Rickroll us.
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 08:32:01 PM
385 Views
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 08:32:01 PM
385 Views
It's link to a video of finnish comedian, I linked it to my friend I was having chat with
- 15/03/2010 09:30:15 PM
631 Views
My role-claim, and a few other thoughts
- 15/03/2010 10:57:55 PM
815 Views
Re: My role-claim, and a few other thoughts
- 16/03/2010 01:53:01 AM
856 Views
LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:24:19 AM
650 Views
Re: LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:32:30 AM
746 Views
Re: LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:39:44 AM
639 Views
Re: LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:54:04 AM
839 Views
Let's NOT kill Bergioyn.
- 16/03/2010 02:59:17 AM
722 Views
Re: Let's NOT kill Bergioyn.
- 16/03/2010 03:08:10 AM
859 Views
I am not making an incorrect reference.
- 16/03/2010 03:12:02 AM
683 Views
Good
- 16/03/2010 03:20:23 AM
782 Views
EBWOP
- 16/03/2010 03:21:08 AM
654 Views
Another thing
- 16/03/2010 03:25:34 AM
841 Views
I'm not Arsonist, so there shouldn't be any neutralization message.
- 16/03/2010 07:01:10 AM
790 Views
Something is wrong here
- 16/03/2010 03:22:47 AM
783 Views
Bergoiyn already had an ironclad claim though.
- 16/03/2010 03:59:44 AM
935 Views
Oh, and Isaac
- 15/03/2010 08:38:08 PM
729 Views
Re: Oh, and Isaac
- 15/03/2010 11:22:21 PM
684 Views
LOL, there was like this massive bomb of posts and now... silence
- 16/03/2010 12:55:34 AM
814 Views
Well for starters I decided maybe I ought to work on my project that's due tomorrow.
- 16/03/2010 02:01:11 AM
802 Views
- 16/03/2010 02:01:11 AM
802 Views
Okay, here ya are
- 15/03/2010 11:58:14 PM
761 Views
Re: Okay, here ya are
- 16/03/2010 07:12:31 AM
703 Views
Re: Okay, here ya are
- 16/03/2010 08:01:24 AM
786 Views
Wait, what?
- 16/03/2010 08:11:54 AM
642 Views
Re: Wait, what?
- 16/03/2010 05:00:39 PM
747 Views
Role Claims (Table)
- 15/03/2010 10:15:59 PM
849 Views
Re: Role Claims (Table) *NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:16:14 PM
384 Views
Whoops, replied instead of editing. *NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:16:29 PM
356 Views
You forgot mine. I calimed VT first, after all.
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:26:27 PM
415 Views
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:26:27 PM
415 Views
Okay, White Flame has claimed, and it seems decently legit.
- 16/03/2010 02:09:50 AM
829 Views
So many RC's, well mine...
- 16/03/2010 02:29:01 AM
848 Views
Now this is an interesting place we have reached, isn't it?
- 16/03/2010 03:25:19 AM
848 Views
Re: Now this is an interesting place we have reached, isn't it?
- 16/03/2010 03:31:27 AM
871 Views
Well, we should have a RoleBlocker too.
- 16/03/2010 03:40:33 AM
849 Views
Re: Well, we should have a RoleBlocker too.
- 16/03/2010 04:01:54 AM
687 Views
Vote Count
- 16/03/2010 03:46:08 AM
688 Views
Re: Vote Count
- 16/03/2010 03:51:48 AM
647 Views
Ahh, that's right.
- 16/03/2010 03:54:56 AM
795 Views
Isaac had voted too, but he unvoted since then. *NM*
- 16/03/2010 04:01:47 AM
380 Views
HOLY CRAP!
- 16/03/2010 05:39:37 AM
856 Views
Re: HOLY CRAP!
- 16/03/2010 01:19:02 PM
632 Views
Re: HOLY CRAP!
- 16/03/2010 04:13:50 PM
796 Views
I must concur
- 16/03/2010 05:24:17 PM
670 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 16/03/2010 11:03:30 PM
775 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 16/03/2010 11:05:48 PM
636 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 17/03/2010 12:32:40 AM
715 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 17/03/2010 12:38:28 AM
644 Views


*NM*