Active Users:445 Time:04/05/2025 01:25:12 AM
Two points: beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM
Firstly, I saw it in IMAX 3D. Dunno if that's what you saw it in, but if not, that could be the cause of our conflict. It's just... insanely better. But as great as IMAX is, the reason Avatar was so beautiful was because it didn't just use the "throw a tomato at the screen" gimmick (in fact, I'm not sure if it used it at all). Put IMAX 3D of Avatar up to, say, "Up" or "Harry Potter," and there's no comparison (although I enjoyed the stories of the latter two much more, but that's neither here nor there...)



Unless there's shit flying off the screen making me duck in my seat I don't see the point of calling it 3D. I want to see a movie that makes me think I'm actually gonna get hit with debris when something gets blown to hell.


That won't happen. Ever. Unless you somehow go back in time and forget what a movie is, you're never going to go "AHHHH A ROCK DUCK!!!!" from a 3D Movie, as we know them today.


The entire problem with 3D movies is that they often try to do what you're talking about, to the exclusion of any other technique. It's basically the equivalent of watching a scary movie, and suddenly the camera pans over and AHHH THERE'S THE KILLER!

It's just shock value, and the realism is ruined the first time you DON'T duck that rock, and it just disappears.

3D- good 3D is about immersion. Unless you plan on making a movie where someone throws something at the screen every 10 seconds, you're gonna need a few new tricks- like Avatar used.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months - 03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM 913 Views
I still haven't seen a single 3D film -- real or otherwise - 03/06/2010 11:29:22 PM 580 Views
Me neither. - 03/06/2010 11:59:27 PM 536 Views
You left out Piranha 3-D. - 03/06/2010 11:53:03 PM 525 Views
3-D what? - 05/06/2010 01:33:26 AM 506 Views
Was Goblet of Fire shot in 3D? - 04/06/2010 12:51:04 AM 546 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie - 04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM 506 Views
I have to disagree. - 04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM 511 Views
Rebuttal - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM 602 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion. - 04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM 574 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new - 04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM 558 Views
Yes - 04/06/2010 08:52:00 AM 544 Views
Two points: - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM 633 Views
Re: Two points: - 07/06/2010 02:32:03 AM 439 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode. - 04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM 511 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D. - 04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM 549 Views
*throws tp all over your house, bushes and trees* *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:26:12 AM 201 Views
I don't care for the In your face-effects... - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM 555 Views
Harry Potter? Seriously? - 04/06/2010 05:16:40 AM 487 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire. - 04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM 617 Views
Absolutely. *NM* - 04/06/2010 09:35:35 AM 189 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs* - 04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM 550 Views
with Avatar, it made the CG more realistic IMO - 04/06/2010 07:37:13 PM 605 Views
That's because you were watching a 3D movie without 3D glasses. - 04/06/2010 11:36:47 PM 554 Views
I agree! *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:41:56 PM 181 Views
I want Mike Leigh and Ken Loach to make 3D films. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:39:51 PM 239 Views
I haven't watched anything in 3D since Captain EO. - 04/06/2010 05:15:11 PM 686 Views
I don't know about 3D - 05/06/2010 01:48:12 AM 504 Views
I try to only see the films made for 3D in a 3D theater. - 05/06/2010 08:40:37 PM 472 Views
Legend of the Guardians actually looks gorgeous. *NM* - 06/06/2010 07:48:09 PM 191 Views
I hate 3D. It makes my eyes hurt. - 07/06/2010 04:13:16 AM 484 Views
I enjoyed Shrek Forever After immensely. - 07/06/2010 09:10:27 AM 574 Views

Reply to Message