Active Users:438 Time:18/09/2025 10:33:10 PM
Re: i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 07/06/2010 02:29:33 AM
i took my glasses off several times during the opening of avatar and either the foreground or background was out of focus without the glasses, depending on which part of the scene was being 3D'd. there was a definite difference between non-glasses and glasses during every scene in the movie.


I saw the 3D film. I took the glasses off and saw a VERY slight blur with the background, but it was nothing that would prevent me from watching the movie that way. It just looked like the background was slightly out of focus. When I put the glasses back on it just brought the background into focus. It did not make the background seem like it had more depth or anything.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months - 03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM 957 Views
I still haven't seen a single 3D film -- real or otherwise - 03/06/2010 11:29:22 PM 624 Views
Me neither. - 03/06/2010 11:59:27 PM 582 Views
You left out Piranha 3-D. - 03/06/2010 11:53:03 PM 574 Views
3-D what? - 05/06/2010 01:33:26 AM 556 Views
Was Goblet of Fire shot in 3D? - 04/06/2010 12:51:04 AM 598 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie - 04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM 558 Views
I have to disagree. - 04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM 559 Views
Rebuttal - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM 647 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion. - 04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM 624 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new - 04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM 604 Views
Yes - 04/06/2010 08:52:00 AM 590 Views
Two points: - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM 685 Views
Re: Two points: - 07/06/2010 02:32:03 AM 482 Views
i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience - 06/06/2010 06:49:31 PM 659 Views
Re: i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience - 07/06/2010 02:29:33 AM 608 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode. - 04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM 561 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D. - 04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM 599 Views
*throws tp all over your house, bushes and trees* *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:26:12 AM 220 Views
I don't care for the In your face-effects... - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM 605 Views
Harry Potter? Seriously? - 04/06/2010 05:16:40 AM 531 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire. - 04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM 665 Views
Absolutely. *NM* - 04/06/2010 09:35:35 AM 206 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs* - 04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM 595 Views
with Avatar, it made the CG more realistic IMO - 04/06/2010 07:37:13 PM 652 Views
That's because you were watching a 3D movie without 3D glasses. - 04/06/2010 11:36:47 PM 607 Views
I agree! *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:41:56 PM 199 Views
I want Mike Leigh and Ken Loach to make 3D films. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:39:51 PM 258 Views
I haven't watched anything in 3D since Captain EO. - 04/06/2010 05:15:11 PM 734 Views
I don't know about 3D - 05/06/2010 01:48:12 AM 554 Views
I try to only see the films made for 3D in a 3D theater. - 05/06/2010 08:40:37 PM 520 Views
Legend of the Guardians actually looks gorgeous. *NM* - 06/06/2010 07:48:09 PM 209 Views
I hate 3D. It makes my eyes hurt. - 07/06/2010 04:13:16 AM 532 Views
I enjoyed Shrek Forever After immensely. - 07/06/2010 09:10:27 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message