The Sith are stronger than individual Jedi, in general, for the simple reason that there can only be two Sith at a time whereas there are many Jedi (admittedly not so many anymore by the time of the original trilogy, but they could retrain and get more again).
That does not fit with the "bring balance to the force" prophecy. If that is to be correct, the balance is achieved by there being two Sith and two Jedi. If their relative strengths were that different, that prophecy would make no sense, as Anakin would (on the contrary) destroy the balance.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
- 11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
1676 Views
To make them a scary menace
- 11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
1224 Views
. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
724 Views
Precisely.
- 12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
1221 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1576 Views
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1576 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
- 11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
1473 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1178 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
- 11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
1297 Views
Mno
- 11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
1269 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
- 11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
1239 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
707 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
- 16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
838 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1178 Views
It makes sense
- 12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
1267 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
- 12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
1052 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
- 13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
1244 Views
Not they don't Edited
- 11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
1192 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
746 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
548 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
683 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
- 11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
1147 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1156 Views
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1156 Views
Nonsense
- 11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
1223 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
655 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
740 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
- 12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
1183 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
- 12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
1061 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
- 12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
1099 Views
It doesn't matter.
- 12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
1081 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
- 13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
1160 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1246 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1246 Views
Because they're more powerful
- 12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
1378 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
1156 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
1152 Views

*NM*