that something like this is how the "undertrained whiner" won.
The Jedi hadn't faced a serious threat in x many years and didn't believe a serious one would arise until it was too late. The Sith knew there was one but were too self confident in their own powers to imagine that threat could defeat them.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1272 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 830 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 510 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 814 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1043 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1053 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 894 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 895 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 852 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 508 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 616 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 832 Views
It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 844 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 679 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 867 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 818 Views
there's also a good chance
12/08/2010 03:26:47 AM
- 737 Views
The same but different
12/08/2010 09:53:10 PM
- 854 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 526 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 358 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 480 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 777 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 794 Views
Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 835 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 422 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 527 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 832 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 700 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 755 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 699 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 728 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 861 Views
Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 921 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 774 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 753 Views