The Sith are stronger than individual Jedi, in general, for the simple reason that there can only be two Sith at a time whereas there are many Jedi (admittedly not so many anymore by the time of the original trilogy, but they could retrain and get more again).
That does not fit with the "bring balance to the force" prophecy. If that is to be correct, the balance is achieved by there being two Sith and two Jedi. If their relative strengths were that different, that prophecy would make no sense, as Anakin would (on the contrary) destroy the balance.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
- 11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
1775 Views
To make them a scary menace
- 11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
1315 Views
. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
780 Views
Precisely.
- 12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
1327 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1684 Views
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1684 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
- 11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
1567 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1283 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
- 11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
1390 Views
Mno
- 11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
1362 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
- 11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
1338 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
772 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
- 16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
882 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1283 Views
It makes sense
- 12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
1363 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
- 12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
1148 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
- 13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
1339 Views
Not they don't Edited
- 11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
1296 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
796 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
595 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
731 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
- 11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
1243 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1250 Views
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1250 Views
Nonsense
- 11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
1325 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
706 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
800 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
- 12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
1270 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
- 12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
1161 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
- 12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
1204 Views
It doesn't matter.
- 12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
1183 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
- 13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
1251 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1372 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1372 Views
Because they're more powerful
- 12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
1499 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
1256 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
1259 Views

*NM*