Active Users:818 Time:01/02/2026 04:02:35 AM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 858 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 626 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 600 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 757 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 689 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 774 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 629 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 615 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 648 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 683 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 714 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 693 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 609 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 564 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 570 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 566 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 696 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 611 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 630 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 611 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 598 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 670 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 672 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 700 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 603 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 733 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 734 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 741 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 701 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 643 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 624 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 665 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 592 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 539 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 600 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 631 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 265 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 269 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 255 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 276 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 574 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 615 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 613 Views

Reply to Message