Active Users:560 Time:05/08/2025 02:37:35 PM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 807 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 578 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 547 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 694 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 620 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 680 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 584 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 560 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 600 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 638 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 654 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 644 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 561 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 520 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 523 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 518 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 643 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 559 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 583 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 556 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 551 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 621 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 624 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 651 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 544 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 685 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 679 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 686 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 650 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 576 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 562 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 594 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 551 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 494 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 549 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 580 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 245 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 245 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 233 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 254 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 522 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 564 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 560 Views

Reply to Message