Active Users:208 Time:18/05/2024 10:45:01 AM
I knew you'd appreciate my post. Legolas Send a noteboard - 08/10/2011 08:42:58 PM
Most of all: it was new, it was fresh at that time. There wasn't such a film since the old cliffhanger shows from the 30s. The mere idea of making a lovable hero stumble from one exotic action sequence to the next doesn't warrant a great film yet, but if you have the talent to make the acting, locations, effects and even the dialogs so much fun, convincing and effective that two hours pass like 10 minutes, you get a classic and that's exactly what happened here.

If I had been entertained instead of bored, I might've agreed... maybe the problem was that I was expecting a movie that was actually good, instead of pure camp - what with the aforementioned reputation of this movie, and IMDB score and all. Having too high expectations for something always makes you rate it even lower than it actually deserves, I guess...
I don't even have to go for the nostalgia effect all that much, I didn't get to see the film before the early 90s. Okay wait, even that's already 20 years ago :disapprove:

I think that counts as nostalgia. :P
The Mummy is a fun film too, but it simply wouldn't exist if it wasn't for Mister Jones.

Yes, granted. Unfortunately it's very nearly the only point in Raiders' favour that I've found in the comparison...

I guess I'll just give the others a pass, accept that Indiana Jones isn't for me, and move on to other classics that I haven't seen yet, and that hopefully I'll find more deserving. Though somehow I doubt too many will be from the '80s, true. :P I do love Breakfast Club, and some others from that decade I'm sure, but I can't think of many.
Reply to message
This one might get some discussion going... we can hope. So I just watched Raiders of the Lost Ark. - 07/10/2011 10:32:19 PM 567 Views
Harrison Ford? - 07/10/2011 10:56:17 PM 331 Views
Obviously I was always going to miss out on the nostalgia factor. But even so. - 07/10/2011 11:09:15 PM 311 Views
I can't actually remember when I first saw it. - 07/10/2011 11:18:10 PM 363 Views
Probably the difference between being a great example of the genre and pioneering it. *NM* - 08/10/2011 12:03:38 AM 112 Views
exactly - 18/10/2011 07:13:38 PM 215 Views
Now? - 08/10/2011 12:47:16 AM 401 Views
I've noticed your difficulties with recognizing the important and great films of the 80s before - 08/10/2011 03:19:37 PM 309 Views
I knew you'd appreciate my post. - 08/10/2011 08:42:58 PM 356 Views
It's something I realized before... - 09/10/2011 04:15:49 PM 282 Views
Or - 09/10/2011 05:47:38 PM 270 Views
Better writing? Better lead actor? *NM* - 08/10/2011 05:34:12 PM 143 Views
You are not my friend. - 09/10/2011 05:35:33 PM 274 Views
It's great sense of fun - 10/10/2011 03:52:28 PM 260 Views

Reply to Message