Active Users:356 Time:04/07/2025 06:12:38 AM
so... Doctor Who? jh Send a noteboard - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM
... So, the master played a rather big role. Tennant's doctor was a bit wussy, but I suppose that is better than "invincible"... I really really get annoyed with Donna, her gramps is better, though. I don't know about the cactus people...

as for the megahumungous spoiler thing in the end and the narrator... I was a bit surprised, actually. I wonder how they will kill them all off. Looks to be an interesting episode the first with both the on screen stuff and this.

Anyone else's first impressions? I wanted to keep the OP relatively spoiler free, but feel free to spoil it if you want to.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 494 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 519 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 428 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 370 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 347 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 470 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 344 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 468 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 342 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 354 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 369 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 443 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 314 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 180 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 368 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 367 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 355 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 352 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 362 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 343 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 425 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 340 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 410 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 442 Views

Reply to Message