Active Users:348 Time:04/07/2025 06:00:02 AM
A good first part *spoilers* Mark Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM
... So, the master played a rather big role. Tennant's doctor was a bit wussy, but I suppose that is better than "invincible"... I really really get annoyed with Donna, her gramps is better, though. I don't know about the cactus people...


I really do enjoy Simm's Master, I think it is the best portrayal of the character. It's interesting that in the voice over The Doctor is described as being the Master's saviour.

I assume that the cactus people will play some part in the second episode as so far there was no real need for them to be there, The Doctor could have figured it all out for himself.

As for Donna, her oblivious persona is meant to be annoying, but I quite like her knowledgeable version which it looks like we are going to get to see.

As for Wilf, I reckon he is a Time Lord. Just with the Doctor pointing out how unusual it is for Wilf to be able to find him and the conversation he had with the woman were she referred to him fighting in a war and not killing a man, I reckon he is a time lord who repressed himself (ala The Doctor and Master a couple of seasons ago) and has failed to revert to a Time Lord (hence not being able to kill a man - Wilf)

as for the megahumungous spoiler thing in the end and the narrator... I was a bit surprised, actually. I wonder how they will kill them all off. Looks to be an interesting episode the first with both the on screen stuff and this.


I reckon it will come down to a choice between saving the Earth (and possably all of Time) or saving Gallafrey.

Anyone else's first impressions? I wanted to keep the OP relatively spoiler free, but feel free to spoil it if you want to.


I wonder will we see The Doctor regenerate at the end of this story or will it be at the beginning of the next season
Once known as Hochopepa

You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. - Simon Pegg
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 492 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 517 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 427 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 369 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 345 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 468 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 343 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 467 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 342 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 353 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 367 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 441 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 313 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 180 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 367 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 366 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 353 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 350 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 361 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 342 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 424 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 340 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 409 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 442 Views

Reply to Message