Active Users:1412 Time:17/12/2025 09:21:34 AM
I always thought it was more a function of the series' budget restrictions. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 03:26:37 PM
Otherwise we find ourselves in the situation of asking why monsters around the world (usually without feet) are sometimes seen wearing shoes made in the 1960s and 1970s on Earth.

Having other races look exactly like people saved on a makeup budget.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 530 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 562 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 488 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 411 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 385 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 510 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 383 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 507 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 376 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 393 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 406 Views
I always thought it was more a function of the series' budget restrictions. - 29/12/2009 03:26:37 PM 420 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 487 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 352 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 196 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 406 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 411 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 397 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 387 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 399 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 378 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 459 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 382 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 447 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 477 Views

Reply to Message